Restart dint help. Although Serkan's reply made me look at how Ant was getting invoked.
I see this warning that tools.jar is missing: [royale-compiler] $ cmd.exe /C "C:\apache\apache-ant-1.9.9\bin\ant.bat -file jenkins.xml -Denv.ASJS_HOME=C:\jenkins\workspace\royale-asjs main && exit %%ERRORLEVEL%%" Unable to locate tools.jar. Expected to find it in C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_251\lib\tools.jar I am pretty sure this is related to this issue. On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:29 PM OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:15 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> Did you reboot your VM? Also, have you checked what user is running >> Jenkins on your VM? I think that can sometimes be a problem. I might be >> running Jenkins as the user. >> >> > Agents don't require Jenkins to be running. I will give the rebooting of > the VM a shot . > > Thanks, > Om > > >> -Alex >> >> On 4/19/20, 10:01 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 9:55 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> > Should be here: >> > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci2.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2FconfigureTools%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=YJq3Ac1xpVWwyQDyFRgYmlcrGXs10W04hhON5QE0%2B90%3D&reserved=0 >> >> >> My git is located in the same exact location as master. >> Moreover, the git call from the commandline executes fine. The git >> call >> from ant exec is what is failing. >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > HTH, >> > -Alex >> > >> > From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> >> > Reply-To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > Date: Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 9:37 PM >> > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI >> > >> > I'm a bit stumped here. The royale-compiler is failing with this >> error: >> > >> > >> > BUILD FAILED >> > >> > c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler\jenkins.xml:55: Execute failed: >> > java.io.IOException: Cannot run program "git" (in directory >> > "c:\jenkins\workspace\royale-compiler"): CreateProcess error=2, The >> system >> > cannot find the file specified >> > >> > at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(Unknown Source) >> > >> > >> > It is from this part of the jenkins.xml: >> > >> > >> > <target name="closure-lib-download" description="Copies Closure >> > Library from GitHub"> >> > <echo message="Be patient. This takes a few minutes..." /> >> > <exec executable="git" failifexecutionfails="true"> >> > <arg value="clone" /> >> > <arg value=" >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=9fgEZdqrtoj75jvA8i0Yi%2FZj6X2rjgIkuShBpIv4Z1I%3D&reserved=0 >> < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fgoogle%2Fclosure-library&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=9fgEZdqrtoj75jvA8i0Yi%2FZj6X2rjgIkuShBpIv4Z1I%3D&reserved=0 >> >" >> > /> >> > <arg value="${closure.root}" /> >> > </exec> >> > <echo>Cloned fresh copy of Google Closure Library</echo> >> > </target> >> > >> > I am not sure how this executable call works without the full path. >> > >> > I checked the env variables, I do have both the git/bin and git/cmd >> > directory in the PATH: >> > >> > [cid:ii_k97zkk9o0] >> > >> > What am I missing? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:54 PM OmPrakash Muppirala < >> bigosma...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > Update - I have successfully attached my VM as a slave agent of our >> > Jenkins instance. >> > I am going to pull the job - /royale-asjs_jsonly and tie it to my >> agent so >> > I can test it. >> > >> > It will fail for a sometime while I go set up my VM with all the >> > dependencies. >> > >> > Once we have the job successfully building on my VM, we can figure >> out how >> > to divide the load between the master and agent. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:59 AM OmPrakash Muppirala < >> bigosma...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > We could achieve the same by creating a new agent (separate vm) and >> > attaching it as a slave to the current Jenkins server. >> > >> > Then we can use labels/tags to tie release jobs to one agent and non >> > release jobs to another agent. >> > >> > That way we can maintain everything in one UI, one login while >> achieving >> > the concurrent building capabilities we want. >> > >> > Jenkins is built for this kind of stuff and I think it would be >> best we >> > followed this practice. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 8:18 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> wrote: >> > Om, I thought you were going to get the image from my VM and run it >> on >> > another VM. Then we'd remove all non-release jobs from your VM and >> all of >> > the release jobs from my VM. That won't solve the problem of how >> long it >> > takes for a commit to be built and tested, but will allow the RM to >> get a >> > release out without getting stuck behind the commit jobs. Is that >> > currently the plan? >> > >> > -Alex >> > >> > On 4/18/20, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com >> <mailto: >> > bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > Makes sense to me. I will set parallel executors back to 1. >> > >> > And start working on a new Jenkins instance. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Om >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020, 12:28 AM Alex Harui >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Are you saying that Java, Ant and Maven do not know how to >> > distribute work >> > > to different cores? >> > > >> > > To repeat my main concern: our Jenkins jobs often use shared >> > resources. >> > > If you want to take the time to fix that, feel free, but I do >> not >> > know how >> > > you are going to keep two jobs from both trying to launch >> Flash >> > Player >> > > Debugger at the same time and open the same socket to >> communicate >> > with it, >> > > or try to parse the flashlog.txt that they have both written >> to. >> > > >> > > The royale-asjs job will use the royale-compiler workspace to >> get the >> > > compiler. If the compiler is building, the jars are not >> there and >> > the >> > > royale-asjs build fails. >> > > >> > > There is also only so much memory and some of our jobs use >> all of it >> > and >> > > I'm not sure if jobs slowed down due to paging memory and >> > writing/reading >> > > from disk, even if it is an SSD. >> > > >> > > I'm done for tonight, but that's what I was seeing last time >> I tried >> > to >> > > have both master and an agent running jobs in parallel. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > On 4/17/20, 11:52 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" < >> bigosma...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > > >> > > A typical setup would be to have 0 executors on master >> and at >> > least n >> > > number of executors on each agent, where n = number of >> cpu cores. >> > > I see that the current VM has 2 cores. So, I started with >> > setting the >> > > num >> > > executors on the current agent to 2. >> > > >> > > This should improve things quite a bit. If this doesn't >> work, I >> > will >> > > create a new VM and make it the slave agent of the current >> > Jenkins >> > > master. >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Om >> > > >> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:31 PM Alex Harui >> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > On your VM or mine? I don't think mine can handle it. >> I used >> > to >> > > run jobs >> > > > of master and agent and we got lots of failures and >> jobs took >> > > forever. If >> > > > two jobs are trying to run tests with the shared Flash >> Player >> > > Debugger, for >> > > > example, you won't get consistent results. >> > > > >> > > > -Alex >> > > > >> > > > On 4/17/20, 11:23 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" < >> > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I just realized that we have only one Agent (node) >> listed >> > under >> > > > Jenkins. I >> > > > am going to add at least one more node to start >> with. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Om >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:58 AM Alex Harui >> > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > I think I followed the instructions and enabled >> SSH. >> > > > > >> > > > > On 4/16/20, 9:37 AM, "Yishay Weiss" < >> > yishayj...@hotmail.com<mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > I haven’t gotten it to work. Could be ssh >> needs to be >> > > enabled on >> > > > the >> > > > > VM [1]. This is nice to have but not essential. >> So Alex, >> > let >> > > me know >> > > > if you >> > > > > want to try that, otherwise I’ll suspend my >> efforts on >> > this. >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=hB66ZhyhDqOPTp0PTxtPV4kzE2iI3TG9ERJCjkCwSaI%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Ftechinpieces%2Fpractical-azure-how-to-enable-ssh-on-azure-vm-84d8fba8103e&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=hB66ZhyhDqOPTp0PTxtPV4kzE2iI3TG9ERJCjkCwSaI%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto: >> yishayj...@hotmail.com >> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> >> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 5:09 PM >> > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org>> >> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI >> > > > > >> > > > > I’d like to try and install an ssh server. >> Can anyone >> > > think of a >> > > > > reason not to do that? I’m asking in terms of >> security, >> > and if >> > > there >> > > > might >> > > > > be a problem because it’s a VM. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks. >> > > > > >> > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto: >> yishayj...@hotmail.com >> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> >> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 10:02 AM >> > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org>> >> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI >> > > > > >> > > > > Related, as most (all?) of the instructions >> don’t >> > require >> > > > anything but >> > > > > a shell wouldn’t it be easier and faster to >> access the >> > machine >> > > with >> > > > ssh >> > > > > [1], rather than using remote desktop? >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003118752&sdata=eaL4SoRKuYDqpNaeLvhnQPiYfTULGYD0JEhBK2mm4a4%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fwindows-server%2Fadministration%2Fopenssh%2Fopenssh_install_firstuse&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=pkKsiZJqksZGMRqgam8yWQU5q4XB78QVI2hFuJj4hbI%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > From: Yishay Weiss<mailto: >> yishayj...@hotmail.com >> > <mailto:yishayj...@hotmail.com>> >> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:55 AM >> > > > > To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: >> > dev@royale.apache.org>> >> > > > > Subject: RE: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI >> > > > > >> > > > > Can’t you do that with remote desktop? >> > > > > >> > > > > ________________________________ >> > > > > From: OmPrakash Muppirala < >> bigosma...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com>> >> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 9:51:25 AM >> > > > > To: Apache Royale Development < >> dev@royale.apache.org >> > <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>> >> > > > > Subject: Re: Prioritize Release Jobs on CI >> > > > > >> > > > > Alex, >> > > > > >> > > > > I believe this is your personal Azure >> subscription >> > right? >> > > Any >> > > > chance >> > > > > I can >> > > > > get access to it so I can try to copy the >> image out >> > the >> > > machine >> > > > and >> > > > > redeploy it somewhere else? >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Om >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 6:18 PM OmPrakash >> Muppirala < >> > > > > bigosma...@gmail.com<mailto:bigosma...@gmail.com >> >> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > I can help set this up on Azure. Give me >> some >> > time to >> > > work >> > > > out the >> > > > > > details? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > Om >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020, 11:49 AM Harbs < >> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> OK. Good to know. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:45 PM, Alex Harui >> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > FWIW, I just looked and the longest job >> in the >> > release >> > > > steps so >> > > > > far is >> > > > > >> 8 minutes. Most are under 2 minutes. >> There >> > might be >> > > jobs >> > > > later >> > > > > that take >> > > > > >> longer that we haven't run yet. IMO, the >> issue >> > isn't >> > > speed >> > > > of the >> > > > > machine, >> > > > > >> it is just that we are sharing the machine >> with >> > longer >> > > jobs >> > > > (1 hour >> > > > > for >> > > > > >> TourDeFlexMigration). And again, the >> machine >> > will be >> > > idle for >> > > > > stretches of >> > > > > >> time while the RM verifies artifacts after >> each >> > step. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > -Alex >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > On 4/12/20, 11:32 AM, "Harbs" < >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> > > > <mailto: >> > > > > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto: >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Fair enough. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > I expect builds to be somewhere >> between 10 >> > and 20 >> > > times >> > > > faster >> > > > > on a >> > > > > >> powerful machine. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Yeah. It’s probably going to be a bit >> of work >> > > changing >> > > > the >> > > > > server, >> > > > > >> but probably worth it in the long run. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > I think I’ll try this when I do the >> next >> > release >> > > unless >> > > > Yishay >> > > > > wants >> > > > > >> to work with me on this for this release — >> but >> > I’m not >> > > going >> > > > to be >> > > > > able to >> > > > > >> help until after Passover (i.e. next week). >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, >> > > > > >> > Harbs >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> On Apr 12, 2020, at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui >> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> The Azure portal says: Standard F2s_v2 >> (2 >> > vcpus, 4 >> > > GiB >> > > > memory) >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> I think I am reading changes to the >> build >> > process in >> > > your >> > > > > >> suggestions. I do not really want to >> spend more >> > of my >> > > time >> > > > on this >> > > > > >> process. But if you want to do the work, >> that's >> > fine >> > > with me. >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> -Alex >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> On 4/12/20, 10:57 AM, "Harbs" < >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> > > > <mailto: >> > > > > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto: >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>> <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto: >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> > > <mailto: >> > > > > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto: >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> What kind of horsepower is included >> in the >> > free >> > > Azure >> > > > account? >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> The server I mentioned builds >> (considerably) >> > > faster than >> > > > my own >> > > > > >> local machine. The ci server seems to >> build many >> > times >> > > slower. >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> One thing we can do to minimize >> running >> > server time >> > > > would be to >> > > > > >> transfer the artifacts to storage instead >> of >> > keeping >> > > them on >> > > > the >> > > > > server. On >> > > > > >> AWS, I’d probably use S3. Not sure what the >> > similar >> > > service on >> > > > > Azure is >> > > > > >> called. >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 8:26 PM, Alex Harui >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID >> > > > > >> <mailto:aha...@adobe.com.INVALID<mailto: >> > aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> OK, that's pretty much how I >> understand Azure >> > as >> > > well. >> > > > The key >> > > > > thing >> > > > > >> is that "running" includes time where the >> CI >> > server is >> > > not >> > > > running >> > > > > any >> > > > > >> Jenkins jobs. The CI Server steps might >> take >> > only a few >> > > > hours of >> > > > > actual >> > > > > >> server time, but there is time where the >> RM is >> > verifying >> > > > artifacts >> > > > > locally >> > > > > >> so you'd be paying for that or the RM >> would have >> > to keep >> > > > shutting >> > > > > down and >> > > > > >> restarting. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Seems like it would be cheaper/simpler >> to get >> > the >> > > free >> > > > MSDN >> > > > > account >> > > > > >> and leave it running. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> -Alex >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> On 4/12/20, 10:15 AM, "Harbs" < >> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com> >> > > > <mailto: >> > > > > >> harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto: >> > harbs.li...@gmail.com>>> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> My experience is with AWS. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> I assume Microsoft has similar >> offerings, >> > but I >> > > don’t >> > > > have >> > > > > >> experience with Azure. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> AWS has on-demand EC2 instances which >> you >> > pay for >> > > only >> > > > the >> > > > > actual >> > > > > >> time that they are running.[1] >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Instances can be started and stopped >> via >> > command >> > > line >> > > > (or via >> > > > > the >> > > > > >> web interface) as long as you have valid >> > credentials to >> > > do so. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> For example: an m5.4xlarge instance >> has 16 >> > cores >> > > and >> > > > costs >> > > > > about >> > > > > >> $1.5 per hour. On a machine like that, a >> full >> > build >> > > would >> > > > probably >> > > > > take >> > > > > >> less than 10 minutes. It’s probably >> possible to >> > do a >> > > full >> > > > release >> > > > > with only >> > > > > >> a few hours of server time. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> Leaving a server like that running >> all the >> > time >> > > would get >> > > > > expensive, >> > > > > >> but if it’s just spun up for releases, >> you’d get >> > very >> > > fast >> > > > builds >> > > > > at a >> > > > > >> reasonable price. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> I’d be happy to pay $10-$50 (and >> possibly >> > more) per >> > > > release to >> > > > > make >> > > > > >> the release process painless for the RM. >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> [1] >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> < >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> >< >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> < >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003128743&sdata=iT0SjMYkQ7EQY7jG2fwkz%2Bjh%2FWTSXdnzALBAeyooXz0%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> >>< >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> < >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> >< >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> < >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > < >> > >> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.amazon.com%2Fec2%2Fpricing%2Fon-demand%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce57b89ef99cd486fd83508d7e4e7e84d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229557003138737&sdata=lYoWGyhdvlZ4Z0Qgoap%2FgDxOwlHgEtu6r9gwxVCSfg4%3D&reserved=0 >> > > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >> > > > > >> >>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Alex >> Harui >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> I'm not very experienced with >> spinning up >> > > servers. The >> > > > CI >> > > > > server we >> > > > > >> are using is effectively free, based on a >> generous >> > > donation >> > > > from >> > > > > Microsoft >> > > > > >> of MSDN accounts to ASF committers. So I >> leave >> > it up >> > > 24/7, >> > > > and >> > > > > share the >> > > > > >> RDP access on private@. I think any >> other ASF >> > > committer >> > > > could do >> > > > > the >> > > > > >> same. IIRC, if that server actually is >> stopped, >> > I have >> > > to >> > > > use my >> > > > > personal >> > > > > >> (unshared) MSDN credentials to start it >> again. >> > AIUI, >> > > if I >> > > > > actually paid >> > > > > >> for the server, it would cost me to leave >> it >> > running >> > > even if >> > > > it >> > > > > didn't run >> > > > > >> jobs between releases. >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> Is that what you are basically >> saying? I >> > think it >> > > might >> > > > be >> > > > > best if >> > > > > >> another committer got a CI server going >> via the MS >> > > donation >> > > > and >> > > > > could leave >> > > > > >> it up 24/7. >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> -Alex >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> On 4/12/20, 9:28 AM, "Harbs" < >> > > harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> I’m willing to do this. >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> Considering that the release will be >> run >> > > infrequently, it >> > > > > should be >> > > > > >> doable to have a relatively powerful >> server that >> > could >> > > be >> > > > spun up on >> > > > > >> demand. This is something I have setup for >> my own >> > > releases. >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> The only complication would be that >> each RM >> > would >> > > need >> > > > valid >> > > > > >> credentials to spin up the server. >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>> Harbs >> > > > > >> >>>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> On Apr 12, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Alex >> Harui >> > > > > <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >> > > > > >> wrote: >> > > > > >> >>>>> >> > > > > >> >>>>> A better solution, IMO, is for >> someone else >> > to >> > > offer up >> > > > a CI >> > > > > server >> > > > > >> only for release jobs. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> >>
