I'd rather not commit to a release branch unless the RM explicitly tells me to, so I just thought I'd mention what I did.
-- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:57 AM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Dev branch is at 0.9.8, so that's when your changes will go out,. > > -Alex > > On 4/20/20, 9:47 AM, "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > > I added some 0.9.7 release notes for both royale-compiler and > royale-asjs. > I committed them to develop, though, so feel free to cherry-pick or > whatever. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC < > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.dev%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5610011ed24409e3ff808d7e54a8468%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229980521581300&sdata=ggjch7VMFRMksgV5hRF60Ir9s%2FOFqWcFq07EormYcUs%3D&reserved=0 > > > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 6:21 AM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > > > wrote: > > > Hi Greg > > > > for compiler: just added improvements to maven by Chris Dutz and > Maven > > Distribution (that's now working) to create SDK with Maven > > I think in compiler Josh should add many of his improvements > > > > Going to check framework > > > > thanks > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > El dom., 19 abr. 2020 a las 2:02, Greg Dove (<greg.d...@gmail.com>) > > escribió: > > > > > I pushed some changes to both compiler and asjs release notes in > branch > > > release/0.9.7 > > > > > > I'd like to suggest that others review this and add more as needed > (as > > > opposed to waiting until late in the process to do it). > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:25 AM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Ok, thanks for clarifying Alex. I will do that later today. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:03 AM Alex Harui > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> IMO, there is no perfect solution. There will be times where > the > > > release > > > >> branch is so broken that it will be tossed and re-cut from > develop. > > But > > > >> this time around we are trying to keep the release branches > around, so > > > make > > > >> changes to the release branch and make sure the RM knows so > they RM > > > knows > > > >> to merge changes back in case we get to the toss-and-re-cut > point. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> -Alex > > > >> > > > >> On 4/17/20, 3:20 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I am not sure whether the current work on 0.9.7 release is > a dry > > run > > > >> or a > > > >> full effort (I have not been reading all details recently, > > sorry). I > > > >> assume > > > >> it is a full release effort. > > > >> > > > >> For 0.9.6 release we had a collective rush to add things to > > RELEASE > > > >> NOTES > > > >> before release. > > > >> > > > >> I have a few things I want to add to RELEASE NOTES. But I > would > > also > > > >> like > > > >> to make sure I apply our collective learning from last time. > > > >> > > > >> The issue last time (iirc) was that we pushed updates into > develop > > > >> branch > > > >> which I think then were being cherry picked into release > branch. > > > This > > > >> I > > > >> believe contributed to some merge conflicts at some point. > > > >> Can I get a definitive answer for where I should add > updates to > > > >> RELEASE > > > >> NOTES at this point if it is not too late? I think it is > probably > > > >> supposed > > > >> to be directly into release branch which then gets merged > later > > back > > > >> into > > > >> develop, but I'd like a confirmation of that if it is > correct (and > > > >> not too > > > >> late), please. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5610011ed24409e3ff808d7e54a8468%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637229980521581300&sdata=bYVSf9Zg5R9DzuwNQIYgZ0o12s4kImSrVtBvTkCFU6U%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >
