Hi Chris, So I had some time today and build whole SDK with your latest changes. Distribution has been prepared without the problem. I didn't check yet building only distribution, but I will. I moved to test produced distribution with small example and Moonshine - It builds without the problems.
I have tried next build our big Royale project with distribution and I'm keep getting following error. Note that I'm able to build this project with ANT distribution. : Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/lang/StringEscapeUtils : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.LiteralEmitter.emit(LiteralEmitter.java:225) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitLiteral(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:1040) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.visitLiteral(ASBlockWalker.java:479) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeSwitch.handle(ASNodeSwitch.java:373) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeHandler.handle(ASNodeHandler.java:85) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.BeforeAfterStrategy.handle(BeforeAfterStrategy.java:110) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.walk(ASBlockWalker.java:159) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.goog.JSGoogEmitter.emitAssignedValue(JSGoogEmitter.java:965) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.JSEmitter.emitAssignmentCoercion(JSEmitter.java:917) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitAssignmentCoercion(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:1558) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.emitContents(FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java:103) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.emit(FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java:50) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.emit(FunctionCallArgumentsEmitter.java:35) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.JSEmitter.emitArguments(JSEmitter.java:259) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitArguments(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:986) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.FunctionCallEmitter.emit(FunctionCallEmitter.java:693) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitFunctionCall(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:906) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.visitFunctionCall(ASBlockWalker.java:330) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeSwitch.handle(ASNodeSwitch.java:207) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeHandler.handle(ASNodeHandler.java:85) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.BeforeAfterStrategy.handle(BeforeAfterStrategy.java:110) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.walk(ASBlockWalker.java:159) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.goog.JSGoogEmitter.emitAssignedValue(JSGoogEmitter.java:965) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.JSEmitter.emitAssignmentCoercion(JSEmitter.java:917) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitAssignmentCoercion(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:1558) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.BinaryOperatorEmitter.super_emitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperatorEmitter.java:598) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.BinaryOperatorEmitter.emit(BinaryOperatorEmitter.java:500) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitBinaryOperator(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:1028) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.visitBinaryOperator(ASBlockWalker.java:538) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeSwitch.handle(ASNodeSwitch.java:348) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeHandler.handle(ASNodeHandler.java:85) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.BeforeAfterStrategy.handle(BeforeAfterStrategy.java:110) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.walk(ASBlockWalker.java:159) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.StatementEmitter.emit(StatementEmitter.java:40) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.StatementEmitter.emit(StatementEmitter.java:29) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.JSEmitter.emitStatement(JSEmitter.java:349) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitStatement(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:1204) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.visitBlock(ASBlockWalker.java:349) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeSwitch.handle(ASNodeSwitch.java:278) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeHandler.handle(ASNodeHandler.java:85) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.BeforeAfterStrategy.handle(BeforeAfterStrategy.java:110) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.walk(ASBlockWalker.java:159) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASEmitter.emitMethodScope(ASEmitter.java:830) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.jx.MethodEmitter.emit(MethodEmitter.java:160) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.js.royale.JSRoyaleEmitter.emitMethod(JSRoyaleEmitter.java:891) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.visitFunction(ASBlockWalker.java:290) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeSwitch.handle(ASNodeSwitch.java:152) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.ASNodeHandler.handle(ASNodeHandler.java:85) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.as.BeforeAfterStrategy.handle(BeforeAfterStrategy.java:110) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.as.ASBlockWalker.walk(ASBlockWalker.java:159) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.royale.MXMLRoyaleEmitter.emitScripts(MXMLRoyaleEmitter.java:2179) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.royale.MXMLRoyaleEmitter.emitDocument(MXMLRoyaleEmitter.java:899) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.royale.MXMLRoyaleBlockWalker.visitDocument(MXMLRoyaleBlockWalker.java:69) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.mxml.MXMLNodeSwitch.handle(MXMLNodeSwitch.java:89) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.MXMLBlockWalker.walk(MXMLBlockWalker.java:156) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.royale.MXMLRoyaleBlockWalker.visitFile(MXMLRoyaleBlockWalker.java:61) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.visitor.mxml.MXMLNodeSwitch.handle(MXMLNodeSwitch.java:95) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.MXMLBlockWalker.walk(MXMLBlockWalker.java:156) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.MXMLBlockWalker.visitCompilationUnit(MXMLBlockWalker.java:187) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.codegen.mxml.MXMLWriter.writeTo(MXMLWriter.java:69) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSCRoyale.compile(MXMLJSCRoyale.java:411) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSCRoyale._mainNoExit(MXMLJSCRoyale.java:259) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSCRoyale.mainNoExit(MXMLJSCRoyale.java:216) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC._mainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:363) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.mainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:298) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.staticMainNoExit(MXMLJSC.java:256) : at org.apache.royale.compiler.clients.MXMLJSC.main(MXMLJSC.java:238) : Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.commons.lang.StringEscapeUtils : at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:582) : at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178) : at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:521) : ... 67 more Thanks, Piotr czw., 4 mar 2021 o 18:46 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Chris, > > I don't know yet. I will check tomorrow or on Monday. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > czw., 4 mar 2021 o 18:36 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > napisał(a): > >> Hi Piotr, >> >> Do things work with "mvn install"? >> >> (you could also use "package", just anything "package" or beyond that) >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 11:25 >> An: dev@royale.apache.org >> Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> >> Aaaaaaahhh ... I think I know what's going on. >> >> I did say "mvn clean install" now multiple times, didn't I? >> I would like to lay emphasis on the "install" (Not "compile") >> >> You are running mvn "compile" ... this is a phase of maven that comes >> before the "packaging" phase. >> All the assembly stuff comes in the "packaging" phase. >> >> So, everything we do after the compile phase will not be executed -> >> Therefore nothing is created in your case. >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 10:59 >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> It doesn't work for me when I do in distribution folder: >> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution >> >> mvn clean compile >> >> I will send you off the list logs from my attempt. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 19:26 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> napisał(a): >> >> > Chris, >> > >> > Building whole framework with with-distribution - works - I didn't >> > test yet created distribution for any project - I will do that soon. >> > >> > I didn't try yet set distributionTargetFolder= >> > d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution - I will try tomorrow. >> > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 16:19 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > napisał(a): >> > >> >> Good that you have explained it maybe someone benefit from it. >> >> >> >> I'm not sure why this stopped work with -DdistributionTargetFolder >> >> and it's working when I'm building whole framework... That is very >> confusing. >> >> >> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 16:02 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >> napisał(a): >> >> >> >>> That should have been two lines: >> >>> >> >>> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution >> >>> >> >>> mvn clean compile >> >>> >> >>> Chris >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:59 >> >>> An: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> >>> Hi Piotr, >> >>> >> >>> you remember that I said you have to set a SYSTEM-property? >> >>> Cause I thought you can't use maven properties to activate maven >> >>> profiles. >> >>> >> >>> The strange thing was that after you reported that it worked with >> >>> maven properties, I gave it a try and it worked (Which confused me a >> >>> bit) I thought perhaps things changed in newer Maven versions. Now >> >>> looking again for a solution to this problem I again found the info >> >>> that it has to be a >> >>> SYSTEM-property: >> >>> >> >>> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Activating-a-profile-in-settings-xm >> >>> l-based-on-a-property-set-in-pom-xml-td512562.html >> >>> >> >>> So please set the distributionTargetFolder property this way: >> >>> >> >>> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution mvn >> >>> clean compile >> >>> >> >>> And I only explained things in detail because from what you wrote I >> >>> had the impression that you didn't really understand what's going on >> >>> and I wanted to provide more background information. >> >>> >> >>> Chris >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:45 >> >>> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> >>> *Comments inline.* >> >>> >> >>> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:42 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> napisał(a): >> >>> >> >>> > > Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff >> >>> > > from >> >>> > the Apache Maven repo. >> >>> > >> >>> > True saying Maven central I meant Apache Maven repo or whatever >> >>> > place this is stored. >> >>> > >> >>> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:41 Christofer Dutz >> >>> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> > napisał(a): >> >>> > >> >>> >> Hi Piotr, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> SNAPSHOT stuff is never downloaded from Maven central. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff >> >>> >> from the Apache Maven repo. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> BUT ... we only deploy snapshots for stuff on develop. Otherwise, >> >>> >> the versions of feature branches would keep on overwriting the >> >>> >> develop artifacts and we would have a non-deterministic behavior. >> >>> >> So ... if we merged my changes in compiler and typedefs to >> >>> >> develop, then the artifacts would be available in Apache's maven >> >>> >> repo, otherwise you have to build them yourself. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> *I do understand how it is working and before I reported you an >> >>> issue I have build whole framework compiler, typedefs and asjs - >> >>> next I went to distribution folder and run:* *mvn clean compile >> >>> -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution * >> >>> >> >>> *Distribution wasn't created. * >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > So, assuming my changes were merged to develop, then you could do >> >>> > it as >> >>> >> you describe. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Hope that explains things. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Chris >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:30 >> >>> >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> >>> >> aligned >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Chris, >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I >> >>> >> expected to be working. If I remember correctly If I run my >> >>> >> command pom from distribution should take care of compiler/royale >> >>> >> version - if the freshest stuff doesn't exists locally it should >> >>> >> download from Maven central - where is the problem ? What has >> >>> >> been changed that this doesn't work like that anymore ? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I >> >>> >> don't have to build whole framework at all. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Thanks, >> >>> >> Piotr >> >>> >> >> >>> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> napisał(a): >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Hi Piotr, >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to >> >>> >> > create a distribution from what was already released? >> >>> >> > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think >> >>> >> > of the distribution as some tooling you can apply to something >> else. >> >>> >> > It's more a facet of the current build. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a " >> >>> >> > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the >> >>> >> distribution. >> >>> >> > Then you could override the 4 properties: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version> >> >>> >> > >> >>> <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version> >> >>> >> > >> >>> <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version> >> >>> >> > <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale. >> >>> >> > framework.version> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2 >> >>> >> > artifacts for the older versions. >> >>> >> > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one >> >>> >> > artifact and the ACE typedef as a second artifact) >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can >> >>> >> > start shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not >> >>> >> > for earlier versions. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Chris >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36 >> >>> >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> >>> >> > aligned >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Chris, >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with >> >>> >> > distribution >> >>> >> > - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole >> >>> >> > SDK or I would like to based my distribution on what I have in >> >>> >> > maven central >> >>> >> > - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ >> >>> >> > and run >> >>> >> command: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > mvn clean compile >> >>> >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare >> >>> distribution. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> > <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> > napisał(a): >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > > You are running in what directory ? >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > > napisał(a): >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> So I'm running: >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install >> >>> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P >> >>> >> > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> And It's working nicely .. same as >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install >> >>> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P >> >>> >> > >> with-distribution >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> Chris >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 >> >>> >> > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven >> >>> >> > >> aligned >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I >> >>> >> > >> have empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 >> >>> >> > >> seconds, which definitely is not good: >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution >> >>> >> 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compc .............................................. >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 8.952 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.559 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.567 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.284 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.347 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.683 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.675 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.295 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 1.305 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ >> >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ >> >>> >> > >> 14.948 s] >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] >> >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> > >> ---- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> -- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] >> >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> > >> ---- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> -- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s [INFO] Finished at: >> >>> >> > >> 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] >> >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> > >> ---- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> -- >> >>> >> > >> --- >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> I'm not sure what is happening. >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> napisał(a): >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> > Hi Piotr, >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was >> >>> >> > >> > something that changed in Maven ... >> >>> >> > >> > What you did should work and be all you need. >> >>> >> > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch >> >>> >> > >> > and run a mvn install on them as they need one new >> >>> >> > >> > artifact from compiler and one new artifact from typedefs. >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> >>> >> > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 >> >>> >> > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> >>> >> > >> > Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate >> >>> >> > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by: >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile >> >>> >> > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution >> >>> >> > >> > \ >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > napisał(a): >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > > Ok ... >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my >> >>> "branch" >> >>> >> > >> > > - Mainly because I don't have a ranch. >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would >> >>> >> > >> > > be cool if you folks could mass-test it. >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 >> >>> >> > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> >> > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef >> >>> >> > >> > > really feels a bit random. >> >>> >> > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for >> today. >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für >> >>> >> > >> > > Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > ________________________________ >> >>> >> > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM >> >>> >> > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > No, >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and >> >>> >> > >> > > build all of them, cause it produces one more artifact >> >>> >> > >> > > in compiler and in the >> >>> >> > >> typedef. >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für >> >>> >> > >> > > Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > ________________________________ >> >>> >> > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM >> >>> >> > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects >> >>> >> > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be >> >>> >> > >> > > a valid .swc file. So, the person who set that up >> >>> >> > >> > > probably just copied one of the >> >>> >> > >> > existing .swc files. >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > Hi Josh, >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them >> ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > I just didn't want to add stuff we don't need. >> >>> >> > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - >> >>> >> > >> > > > I'll add them >> >>> >> > >> > > > ;-) >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder >> >>> >> > >> > > > appear like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, >> >>> >> > >> > > > so I now just added these. >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort >> >>> >> > >> > > > of seems pretty strange ... can anyone explain what >> >>> >> > >> > > > it's required >> >>> >> for? >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" >> >>> >> > >> > > > /> >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a >> >>> >> > >> > > > location the FlashBuilder might be looking for. >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors >> >>> >> > >> > > > to have a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we >> >>> >> > >> > > > could one day simply >> >>> >> > >> > remove. >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 >> >>> >> > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and >> >>> >> > >> > > > Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > macfonts.ser and winfonts.ser >> >>> >> > >> > > > files are needed for? >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would >> >>> >> > >> > > > assume that Flash Builder expects those files to >> >>> >> > >> > > > exist, but if the Flash Builder integration document >> >>> >> > >> > > > doesn't mention them, then I don't >> >>> >> > >> know. >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Hi Josh, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config >> >>> >> > >> > > > > files used in the Maven distribution should now >> >>> >> > >> > > > > match the file names in the >> >>> >> > >> > > distribution. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > macfonts.ser and winfonts.ser files are needed for? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > They are simply completely empty filed the Ant build >> >>> >> > >> > > > > createates via >> >>> "touch" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > commant. I could add them to the Maven distribution, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > but only want to add stuff >> >>> >> > >> > that's needed. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > new >> >>> >> > >> distribution. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there >> >>> >> > >> > > > > and in the same location as with the Ant build, but >> >>> >> > >> > > > > I left away things I tought are probably not >> >>> >> > >> > > > > required in the distribution and are results of >> >>> >> > >> > > > > simply packing the entire >> >>> >> project up. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it >> >>> >> > >> > > > > worked with all of them (Haven't tried all of them >> >>> >> > >> > > > > though) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me >> >>> >> > >> > > > > some feedback on >> >>> >> > >> > it. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development >> >>> >> > >> > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE >> >>> >> > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Hi all, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > directory to allow the >> >>> >> > >> code-insights? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > essential parts of the >> >>> >> > >> > > "asjs" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system >> >>> >> included. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > completely understood the typedef stuff ;) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > names of the typedef libraries in all of these 2 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > (Well actually probably just >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > 2) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > it a day and signing off for today. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > folks want to check what I'm doing ... now you >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > have something to look at >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > :.) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > options: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > and swf-external-library-path. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > JS and SWF targets, but you can use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path for a >> >>> >> > >> > > > specific target. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is >> defined: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and it will ignore >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > defined: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and it will ignore >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > royale-config.xml configs are all expected to be >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > used for both JS and SWF >> >>> >> > targets. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > we're using js-external-library-path to override >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > which libraries are used for the JS target. The >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > SWF target will use >> >>> >> > >> external-library-path. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > expected to be used with JS only. Basically, these >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > ones can use external-library-path directly >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > because they don't need to target SWF. If we >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > wanted, we could change them to use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should >> >>> >> > >> > > > > still work. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and never use >> >>> >> > external-library-path. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > reason (like Flash Builder support) for why we >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > defaulted to playerglobal.swc on the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path for the SWF target instead >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > of using swf-external-library-path. I think that >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path were introduced before I >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > started working on >> >>> >> > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > some inconsistencies in the config files and I'm >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > currently not quite sure to which is the correct >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > version: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > In: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml The typedefs are defined in an >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > element called: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > In: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml The typedefs are defined in >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > an element called: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > defined as properties in all configs except: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > thought I'd point it >> >>> >> > >> > > > > out. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > is doing too, so I think you are correct. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > sort of were creatd shortly after the big-bang >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > ;-) >> >>> ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > each >> >>> by: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > the swfversion >> >>> >> > >> 3. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > including the output in the distribution and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > not the templates, as I assume they are not >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > needed. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > have existed since the Flex days. The >> "create-config" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > task in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > tokens in the template based on the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > build's current >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > configuration. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > all of the Ant build.xml files to allow users >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > to manually rebuild the framework with local >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > changes. If this still holds true, then the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > config templates are >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > probably required. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > wrote: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > they always were in the frameworks dir ... I >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > think the ANT build takes the templates and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > inserts variables to generate the real >> >>> >> > >> > > versions. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with maven >> >>> >> > >> ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > out of >> >>> >> sync. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > files need to be in the distribution? Are >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > they needed for >> >>> >> > anything? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > the Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > of >> >>> >> tupples: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Where does the xyz-config.xml get >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > generated from the template in the ANT >> >>> >> > >> > > > build? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > templates as part of the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > build)... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > seems as if they are only needed to >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > generate the configs for a given set of >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > configured >> >>> properties. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > If that's the case, we don't need them in >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > distribution. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > you when you created the maven build for >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Royale. So if you think you can remove >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > templates, I think it would be good to >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > reduce files if they are not >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > used at all. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > was named >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > "roayale-config" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > "flex-config" in the Ant distribution and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > it contained a reference to the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > version contain a lot more implicit >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > imports as well as a fxg-base-class >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > element >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with fx:Array >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the distribution in the >> >>> >> "features/distribution-allignment" >> >>> >> > >> > branch. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Great! >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > try to get the maven distribution to have >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the same directory structure as the Ant >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > one (but excluding all the >> >>> >> > >> unnecessary stuff). >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I'll do a >> >>> >> > >> try. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in >> >>> >> "compiler-externc" >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are >> >>> identical ... >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > a bit rusty regarding how all of these >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > externs and stuff work >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > together) >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > lists the mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the non-swf as well as the with-swf >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > to the configuration >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > changes anything. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_Fla >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > shBu >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ild >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > er >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > t >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > at master >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/ma >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ster >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > /id >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > e/ >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > fla >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > sh >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > (we don't have the entire >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as >> >>> expected. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > that could be >> >>> >> > >> > wrong. >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira Apache Member & Apache Royale >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > PMC *Apache Software >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > > >> >>> >> > >> > > >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > -- >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> > >> > >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> -- >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > -- >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > -- >> >>> > >> >>> > Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> >> >>> Piotr Zarzycki >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
