Good that you have explained it maybe someone benefit from it.

I'm not sure why this stopped work with -DdistributionTargetFolder and it's
working when I'm building whole framework... That is very confusing.

śr., 3 mar 2021 o 16:02 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
napisał(a):

> That should have been two lines:
>
> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution
>
> mvn clean compile
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:59
> An: dev@royale.apache.org
> Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned
>
> Hi Piotr,
>
> you remember that I said you have to set a SYSTEM-property?
> Cause I thought you can't use maven properties to activate maven profiles.
>
> The strange thing was that after you reported that it worked with maven
> properties, I gave it a try and it worked (Which confused me a bit) I
> thought perhaps things changed in newer Maven versions. Now looking again
> for a solution to this problem I again found the info that it has to be a
> SYSTEM-property:
>
> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Activating-a-profile-in-settings-xml-based-on-a-property-set-in-pom-xml-td512562.html
>
> So please set the distributionTargetFolder property this way:
>
> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution mvn clean
> compile
>
> And I only explained things in detail because from what you wrote I had
> the impression that you didn't really understand what's going on and I
> wanted to provide more background information.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:45
> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned
>
> *Comments inline.*
>
> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:42 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> napisał(a):
>
> > >  Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff
> > > from
> > the Apache Maven repo.
> >
> > True saying Maven central I meant Apache Maven repo or whatever place
> > this is stored.
> >
> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:41 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> Hi Piotr,
> >>
> >> SNAPSHOT stuff is never downloaded from Maven central.
> >>
> >> Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff from
> >> the Apache Maven repo.
> >>
> >> BUT ... we only deploy snapshots for stuff on develop. Otherwise, the
> >> versions of feature branches would keep on overwriting the develop
> >> artifacts and we would have a non-deterministic behavior. So ... if
> >> we merged my changes in compiler and typedefs to develop, then the
> >> artifacts would be available in Apache's maven repo, otherwise you
> >> have to build them yourself.
> >>
> >>
> *I do understand how it is working and before I reported you an issue I
> have build whole framework compiler, typedefs and asjs - next I went to
> distribution folder and run:* *mvn clean compile
> -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution *
>
> *Distribution wasn't created. *
>
>
> > So, assuming my changes were merged to develop, then you could do it
> > as
> >> you describe.
> >>
> >> Hope that explains things.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:30
> >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned
> >>
> >> Chris,
> >>
> >> I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I
> >> expected to be working. If I remember correctly If I run my command
> >> pom from distribution should take care of compiler/royale version -
> >> if the freshest stuff doesn't exists locally it should download from
> >> Maven central - where is the problem ? What has been changed that
> >> this doesn't work like that anymore ?
> >>
> >> In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I don't
> >> have to build whole framework at all.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Hi Piotr,
> >> >
> >> > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to create
> >> > a distribution from what was already released?
> >> > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think of
> >> > the distribution as some tooling you can apply to something else.
> >> > It's more a facet of the current build.
> >> >
> >> > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a "
> >> > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the
> >> distribution.
> >> > Then you could override the 4 properties:
> >> >
> >> >     <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version>
> >> >     <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version>
> >> >     <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version>
> >> >     <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.
> >> > framework.version>
> >> >
> >> > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2
> >> > artifacts for the older versions.
> >> > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one
> >> > artifact and the ACE typedef as a second artifact)
> >> >
> >> > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can
> >> > start shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not for
> >> > earlier versions.
> >> >
> >> > Chris
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36
> >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned
> >> >
> >> > Chris,
> >> >
> >> > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with
> >> > distribution
> >> > - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole SDK
> >> > or I would like to based my distribution on what I have in maven
> >> > central
> >> > - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ and
> >> > run
> >> command:
> >> >
> >> > mvn clean compile
> >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution
> >> >
> >> > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare
> distribution.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > napisał(a):
> >> >
> >> > > You are running in what directory ?
> >> > >
> >> > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz
> >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > > napisał(a):
> >> > >
> >> > >> So I'm running:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> mvn  -DskipTests=true clean install
> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P
> >> > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf
> >> > >>
> >> > >> And It's working nicely .. same as
> >> > >>
> >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install
> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P
> >> > >> with-distribution
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Chris
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59
> >> > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven
> >> > >> aligned
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I have
> >> > >> empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 seconds, which
> >> > >> definitely is not good:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution
> >> 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT:
> >> > >> [INFO]
> >> > >> [INFO] compc ..............................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  8.952 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-asc .......................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.559 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compc .....................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.567 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ...................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.284 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc .....................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.347 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ...................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.683 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer .................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.675 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ...................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.295 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] mxmlc ..............................................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >>  1.305 s]
> >> > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................
> >> > >> SUCCESS [
> >> > >> 14.948 s]
> >> > >> [INFO]
> >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> >> > >> [INFO]
> >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> [INFO] Total time:  36.807 s
> >> > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO]
> >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >>
> >> > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'm not sure what is happening.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> napisał(a):
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Hi Piotr,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was something
> >> > >> > that changed in Maven ...
> >> > >> > What you did should work and be all you need.
> >> > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch and
> >> > >> > run a mvn install on them as they need one new artifact from
> >> > >> > compiler and one new artifact from typedefs.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Chris
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09
> >> > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven
> >> > >> > aligned
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate
> >> > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile
> >> > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution\
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > napisał(a):
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > Ok ...
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my "branch"
> >> > >> > > - Mainly because I don't have a ranch.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would be
> >> > >> > > cool if you folks could mass-test it.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Chris
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09
> >> > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven
> >> > >> > > aligned
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef really
> >> > >> > > feels a bit random.
> >> > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Chris
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > ________________________________
> >> > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM
> >> > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven
> >> > >> > > aligned
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > No,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and build
> >> > >> > > all of them, cause it produces one more artifact in compiler
> >> > >> > > and in the
> >> > >> typedef.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Chris
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > ________________________________
> >> > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM
> >> > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven
> >> > >> > > aligned
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects
> >> > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be a
> >> > >> > > valid .swc file. So, the person who set that up probably
> >> > >> > > just copied one of the
> >> > >> > existing .swc files.
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > --
> >> > >> > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > > Hi Josh,
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ...
> >> > >> > > > I just didn't want to add stuff we don't need.
> >> > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - I'll
> >> > >> > > > add them
> >> > >> > > > ;-)
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >         <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder
> >> > >> > > > appear like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder -->
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, so I
> >> > >> > > > now just added these.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort of
> >> > >> > > > seems pretty strange ... can anyone explain what it's
> >> > >> > > > required
> >> for?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >         <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc"
> >> > >> > > >
>  tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc"
> >> > >> > > > />
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a
> >> > >> > > > location the FlashBuilder might be looking for.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors to
> >> > >> > > > have a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we could
> >> > >> > > > one day simply
> >> > >> > remove.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47
> >> > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and
> >> > >> > > > Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser
> >> > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser
> >> > >> > > > files are needed for?
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would
> >> > >> > > > assume that Flash Builder expects those files to exist,
> >> > >> > > > but if the Flash Builder integration document doesn't
> >> > >> > > > mention them, then I don't
> >> > >> know.
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > --
> >> > >> > > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Hi Josh,
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-)
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config
> >> > >> > > > > files used in the Maven distribution should now match
> >> > >> > > > > the file names in the
> >> > >> > > distribution.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, macfonts.ser
> >> > >> > > > > and winfonts.ser files are needed for? They are simply
> >> > >> > > > > completely empty filed the Ant build createates via "touch"
> >> > >> > > > > commant. I could add them to the Maven distribution, but
> >> > >> > > > > only want to add stuff
> >> > >> > that's needed.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the new
> >> > >> distribution.
> >> > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there and
> >> > >> > > > > in the same location as with the Ant build, but I left
> >> > >> > > > > away things I tought are probably not required in the
> >> > >> > > > > distribution and are results of simply packing the
> >> > >> > > > > entire
> >> project up.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it
> >> > >> > > > > worked with all of them (Haven't tried all of them
> >> > >> > > > > though)
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me some
> >> > >> > > > > feedback on
> >> > >> > it.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35
> >> > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and
> >> > >> > > > > Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE
> >> > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app.
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Hi all,
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src
> >> > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" directory
> >> > >> > > > > > to allow the
> >> > >> code-insights?
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the essential
> >> > >> > > > > > parts of the
> >> > >> > > "asjs"
> >> > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system
> >> included.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18
> >> > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and
> >> > >> > > > > > Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never completely
> >> > >> > > > > > understood the typedef stuff ;)
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the names
> >> > >> > > > > > of the typedef libraries in all of these 2 (Well
> >> > >> > > > > > actually probably just
> >> > >> > > > > > 2)
> >> > >> > > > > > - external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling it a
> >> > >> > > > > > day and signing off for today.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you
> >> > >> > > > > > folks want to check what I'm doing ... now you have
> >> > >> > > > > > something to look at
> >> > >> > > > > > :.)
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13
> >> > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and
> >> > >> > > > > > Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different
> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > options:
> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path and
> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both JS
> >> > >> > > > > > and SWF targets, but you can use
> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or swf-external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > to override the external-library-path for a
> >> > >> > > > specific target.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is defined:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and
> >> > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path,
> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >  If both js-external-library-path and
> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are
> >> > >> > > > > > defined:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, and
> >> > >> > > > > > it will ignore external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use swf-external-library-path,
> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and
> >> > >> > > > > > royale-config.xml configs are all expected to be used
> >> > >> > > > > > for both JS and SWF
> >> > targets.
> >> > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so
> >> > >> > > > > > we're using js-external-library-path to override which
> >> > >> > > > > > libraries are used for the JS target. The SWF target
> >> > >> > > > > > will use
> >> > >> external-library-path.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are
> >> > >> > > > > > expected to be used with JS only. Basically, these
> >> > >> > > > > > ones can use external-library-path directly because
> >> > >> > > > > > they don't need to target SWF. If we wanted, we could
> >> > >> > > > > > change them to use js-external-library-path instead,
> >> > >> > > > > > and they should
> >> > >> > > > > still work.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use
> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path and
> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and never use
> >> > external-library-path.
> >> > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy
> >> > >> > > > > > reason (like Flash Builder support) for why we
> >> > >> > > > > > defaulted to playerglobal.swc on the
> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path for the SWF target instead of
> >> > >> > > > > > using swf-external-library-path. I think that
> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or swf-external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > were introduced before I started working on
> >> > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess.
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh,
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are some
> >> > >> > > > > > > inconsistencies in the config files and I'm
> >> > >> > > > > > > currently not quite sure to which is the correct
> >> > >> > > > > > > version:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > In:
> >> > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called:
> >> > >> > > > > > > external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > In:
> >> > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > The typedefs are defined in an element called:
> >> > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version?
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version defined
> >> > >> > > > > > > as properties in all configs except:
> >> > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14)
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the
> >> > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others.
> >> > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just
> >> > >> > > > > > > thought I'd point it
> >> > >> > > > > out.
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29
> >> > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development
> >> > >> > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant
> >> > >> > > > > > > and Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris,
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build is
> >> > >> > > > > > > doing too, so I think you are correct.
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they
> >> > >> > > > > > > > sort of were creatd shortly after the big-bang ;-)
> ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis.
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from each by:
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing the
> >> > >> > > > > > > > swfversion
> >> > >> 3.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf
> >> > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to
> >> > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only
> >> > >> > > > > > > > including the output in the distribution and not
> >> > >> > > > > > > > the templates, as I assume they are not
> >> > >> > > > > > needed.
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect?
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46
> >> > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development
> >> > >> > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant
> >> > >> > > > > > > > and Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files have
> >> > >> > > > > > > > existed since the Flex days. The "create-config"
> >> > >> > > > > > > > task in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain
> >> > >> > > > > > > > tokens in the template based on the Ant build's
> >> > >> > > > > > > > current
> >> > >> > > > > > > configuration.
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include all of
> >> > >> > > > > > > > the Ant build.xml files to allow users to manually
> >> > >> > > > > > > > rebuild the framework with local changes. If this
> >> > >> > > > > > > > still holds true, then the config templates are
> >> > >> > > > > > > probably required.
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala
> >> > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos,
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > they always were in the frameworks dir ... I
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > think the ANT build takes the templates and
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > inserts variables to generate the real
> >> > >> > > versions.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with maven
> >> > >> ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty out
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > of
> >> sync.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template"
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > files need to be in the distribution? Are they
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > needed for
> >> > anything?
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris,
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions:
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log of
> >> tupples:
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml:
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Where does the xyz-config.xml get generated
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > from the template in the ANT
> >> > >> > > > build?
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the templates
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > as part of the
> >> > >> > > > > > > build)...
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > seems as if they are only needed to generate
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the configs for a given set of configured
> properties.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > If that's the case, we don't need them in the
> >> > >> > > > > > > distribution.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by you
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > when you created the maven build for Royale. So
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > if you think you can remove templates, I think
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > it would be good to reduce files if they are not
> >> > >> > > > > > used at all.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml was
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > named
> >> > >> > > > > > "roayale-config"
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and "flex-config" in
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the Ant distribution and it contained a
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > reference to the mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > did the Ant version contain a lot more
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > implicit imports as well as a fxg-base-class
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > element
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with fx:Array
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated the
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > distribution in the
> >> "features/distribution-allignment"
> >> > >> > branch.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Great!
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and try
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > to get the maven distribution to have the same
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > directory structure as the Ant one (but
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > excluding all the
> >> > >> unnecessary stuff).
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I'll do a
> >> > >> try.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this!
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in
> >> "compiler-externc"
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are identical
> ...
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm a
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bit rusty regarding how all of these externs
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > and stuff work
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > together)
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml lists
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both the
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > non-swf as well as the with-swf
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that to
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the configuration
> >> > >> > > > > > > > changes anything.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > and Maven aligned
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link:
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_FlashBu
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ild
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > er
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > t
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > at master
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)<
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/master
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > /id
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > e/
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > fla
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > sh
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it (we
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > don't have the entire
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this?
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as expected.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things that
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > could be
> >> > >> > wrong.
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > --
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC *Apache
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Software
> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > > >
> >> > >> > > > >
> >> > >> > > >
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > --
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> --
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Reply via email to