Chris, I don't know yet. I will check tomorrow or on Monday.
Thanks, Piotr czw., 4 mar 2021 o 18:36 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> napisał(a): > Hi Piotr, > > Do things work with "mvn install"? > > (you could also use "package", just anything "package" or beyond that) > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 11:25 > An: dev@royale.apache.org > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > Aaaaaaahhh ... I think I know what's going on. > > I did say "mvn clean install" now multiple times, didn't I? > I would like to lay emphasis on the "install" (Not "compile") > > You are running mvn "compile" ... this is a phase of maven that comes > before the "packaging" phase. > All the assembly stuff comes in the "packaging" phase. > > So, everything we do after the compile phase will not be executed -> > Therefore nothing is created in your case. > > > Chris > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. März 2021 10:59 > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > > Hi Chris, > > It doesn't work for me when I do in distribution folder: > set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > > mvn clean compile > > I will send you off the list logs from my attempt. > > Thanks, > Piotr > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 19:26 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > Chris, > > > > Building whole framework with with-distribution - works - I didn't > > test yet created distribution for any project - I will do that soon. > > > > I didn't try yet set distributionTargetFolder= > > d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution - I will try tomorrow. > > > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 16:19 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Good that you have explained it maybe someone benefit from it. > >> > >> I'm not sure why this stopped work with -DdistributionTargetFolder > >> and it's working when I'm building whole framework... That is very > confusing. > >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 16:02 Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >>> That should have been two lines: > >>> > >>> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > >>> > >>> mvn clean compile > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:59 > >>> An: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > >>> > >>> Hi Piotr, > >>> > >>> you remember that I said you have to set a SYSTEM-property? > >>> Cause I thought you can't use maven properties to activate maven > >>> profiles. > >>> > >>> The strange thing was that after you reported that it worked with > >>> maven properties, I gave it a try and it worked (Which confused me a > >>> bit) I thought perhaps things changed in newer Maven versions. Now > >>> looking again for a solution to this problem I again found the info > >>> that it has to be a > >>> SYSTEM-property: > >>> > >>> http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Activating-a-profile-in-settings-xm > >>> l-based-on-a-property-set-in-pom-xml-td512562.html > >>> > >>> So please set the distributionTargetFolder property this way: > >>> > >>> set distributionTargetFolder= d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution mvn > >>> clean compile > >>> > >>> And I only explained things in detail because from what you wrote I > >>> had the impression that you didn't really understand what's going on > >>> and I wanted to provide more background information. > >>> > >>> Chris > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:45 > >>> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven aligned > >>> > >>> *Comments inline.* > >>> > >>> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:42 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> napisał(a): > >>> > >>> > > Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff > >>> > > from > >>> > the Apache Maven repo. > >>> > > >>> > True saying Maven central I meant Apache Maven repo or whatever > >>> > place this is stored. > >>> > > >>> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 15:41 Christofer Dutz > >>> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> > napisał(a): > >>> > > >>> >> Hi Piotr, > >>> >> > >>> >> SNAPSHOT stuff is never downloaded from Maven central. > >>> >> > >>> >> Maven central only serves released stuff. We get SNAPSHOT stuff > >>> >> from the Apache Maven repo. > >>> >> > >>> >> BUT ... we only deploy snapshots for stuff on develop. Otherwise, > >>> >> the versions of feature branches would keep on overwriting the > >>> >> develop artifacts and we would have a non-deterministic behavior. > >>> >> So ... if we merged my changes in compiler and typedefs to > >>> >> develop, then the artifacts would be available in Apache's maven > >>> >> repo, otherwise you have to build them yourself. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> *I do understand how it is working and before I reported you an > >>> issue I have build whole framework compiler, typedefs and asjs - > >>> next I went to distribution folder and run:* *mvn clean compile > >>> -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution * > >>> > >>> *Distribution wasn't created. * > >>> > >>> > >>> > So, assuming my changes were merged to develop, then you could do > >>> > it as > >>> >> you describe. > >>> >> > >>> >> Hope that explains things. > >>> >> > >>> >> Chris > >>> >> > >>> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 15:30 > >>> >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >>> >> aligned > >>> >> > >>> >> Chris, > >>> >> > >>> >> I'm reporting you how I used to create distribution and how I > >>> >> expected to be working. If I remember correctly If I run my > >>> >> command pom from distribution should take care of compiler/royale > >>> >> version - if the freshest stuff doesn't exists locally it should > >>> >> download from Maven central - where is the problem ? What has > >>> >> been changed that this doesn't work like that anymore ? > >>> >> > >>> >> In general preparing distribution should take max 5 minutes - I > >>> >> don't have to build whole framework at all. > >>> >> > >>> >> Thanks, > >>> >> Piotr > >>> >> > >>> >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:53 Christofer Dutz > >>> >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> napisał(a): > >>> >> > >>> >> > Hi Piotr, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Well, that's something completely different. So, you want to > >>> >> > create a distribution from what was already released? > >>> >> > That's not how the maven-assembly-plugin works. You can't think > >>> >> > of the distribution as some tooling you can apply to something > else. > >>> >> > It's more a facet of the current build. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Theoretically you should be able to do that if we also had a " > >>> >> > royale.framework.version" property and would use that in the > >>> >> distribution. > >>> >> > Then you could override the 4 properties: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > <royale.build-tools.version>1.2.1</royale.build-tools.version> > >>> >> > > >>> <royale.compiler.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.compiler.version> > >>> >> > > >>> <royale.typedefs.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale.typedefs.version> > >>> >> > <royale.framework.version>0.9.8-SNAPSHOT</royale. > >>> >> > framework.version> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > But even that wouldn't work as we would still be missing 2 > >>> >> > artifacts for the older versions. > >>> >> > (I now zip up the shell scripts of the compiler module as one > >>> >> > artifact and the ACE typedef as a second artifact) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > If the distribution built from the current state works, we can > >>> >> > start shipping Maven-built distributions starting now, but not > >>> >> > for earlier versions. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Chris > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 14:36 > >>> >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >>> >> > aligned > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Chris, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > What you are showing me is running and building SDK with > >>> >> > distribution > >>> >> > - that is ok - this is one option, but If I already build whole > >>> >> > SDK or I would like to based my distribution on what I have in > >>> >> > maven central > >>> >> > - I should be able to go to directory royale-asjs\distribution\ > >>> >> > and run > >>> >> command: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > mvn clean compile > >>> >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I don't have to be forced to build SDK in order to prepare > >>> distribution. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:30 Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > napisał(a): > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > You are running in what directory ? > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 14:27 Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > > napisał(a): > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > >> So I'm running: > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >>> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >>> >> > >> with-distribution,option-with-swf > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> And It's working nicely .. same as > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> mvn -DskipTests=true clean install > >>> >> > >> -DdistributionTargetFolder=C:\Temp\RoyaleSDK-with-swf -P > >>> >> > >> with-distribution > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> Chris > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 13:59 > >>> >> > >> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and Maven > >>> >> > >> aligned > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> Unfortunately it didn't work. After build in distribution I > >>> >> > >> have empty folder. Whole build of distribution took 36 > >>> >> > >> seconds, which definitely is not good: > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Distribution > >>> >> 0.9.8-SNAPSHOT: > >>> >> > >> [INFO] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compc .............................................. > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 8.952 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-asc ....................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.559 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compc ..................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.567 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-compjsc ................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.284 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmlc ..................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.347 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-mxmljsc ................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.683 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-optimizer ................................. > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.675 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] compiler-swfdump ................................... > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.295 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] mxmlc .............................................. > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 1.305 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] Apache Royale: Distribution ........................ > >>> >> > >> SUCCESS [ > >>> >> > >> 14.948 s] > >>> >> > >> [INFO] > >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> >> > >> ---- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> -- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > >>> >> > >> [INFO] > >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> >> > >> ---- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> -- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> [INFO] Total time: 36.807 s [INFO] Finished at: > >>> >> > >> 2021-03-03T13:55:54+01:00 [INFO] > >>> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> >> > >> ---- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> -- > >>> >> > >> --- > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> D:\Work\royale-sources\royale-asjs\distribution> > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> I'm not sure what is happening. > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 13:32 Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> napisał(a): > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > Hi Piotr, > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > sorry for the confusion earlier ... guess that was > >>> >> > >> > something that changed in Maven ... > >>> >> > >> > What you did should work and be all you need. > >>> >> > >> > But be sure to check-out all 3 repos in the feature-branch > >>> >> > >> > and run a mvn install on them as they need one new > >>> >> > >> > artifact from compiler and one new artifact from typedefs. > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > Von: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > >> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 12:09 > >>> >> > >> > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >>> >> > >> > Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > Cool. I have switched to your branch. How do I generate > >>> >> > >> > distribution now using Maven ? I did that previously by: > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > royale-asjs\distribution\ mvn clean compile > >>> >> > >> > -DdistributionTargetFolder=d:\Work\royale_ide\distribution > >>> >> > >> > \ > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > śr., 3 mar 2021 o 11:43 Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > napisał(a): > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > Ok ... > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > you don't need to switch all 3 to my "ranch" but to my > >>> "branch" > >>> >> > >> > > - Mainly because I don't have a ranch. > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > But I think I've addressed everything I found ... would > >>> >> > >> > > be cool if you folks could mass-test it. > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. März 2021 00:09 > >>> >> > >> > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> >> > >> > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > And regarding that Halo.swc, > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > I would use a different one, as using the js typedef > >>> >> > >> > > really feels a bit random. > >>> >> > >> > > But that's something for tomorrow... Signing off for today. > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für > >>> >> > >> > > Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > ________________________________ > >>> >> > >> > > From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 12:06:32 AM > >>> >> > >> > > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > No, > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Unfortunately you need to switch all 3 to my ranch and > >>> >> > >> > > build all of them, cause it produces one more artifact > >>> >> > >> > > in compiler and in the > >>> >> > >> typedef. > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > Holen Sie sich Outlook für > >>> >> > >> > > Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > ________________________________ > >>> >> > >> > > From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 11:14:19 PM > >>> >> > >> > > To: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > Subject: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >>> >> > >> > > Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > I'm guessing that Flash Builder expects > >>> >> > >> > > frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc to exist, and it must be > >>> >> > >> > > a valid .swc file. So, the person who set that up > >>> >> > >> > > probably just copied one of the > >>> >> > >> > existing .swc files. > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:01 PM Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > > Hi Josh, > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > Well it would probably take me 10 seconds to add them ... > >>> >> > >> > > > I just didn't want to add stuff we don't need. > >>> >> > >> > > > So I'll leave them away and if someone complains - > >>> >> > >> > > > I'll add them > >>> >> > >> > > > ;-) > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > However the comment in the Ant script says: > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > <!-- fake a bunch of files to make the folder > >>> >> > >> > > > appear like a valid Flex SDK to Flash Builder --> > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > So I already had all the other dummy files in there, > >>> >> > >> > > > so I now just added these. > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > In this block there is however this command which sort > >>> >> > >> > > > of seems pretty strange ... can anyone explain what > >>> >> > >> > > > it's required > >>> >> for? > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > <copy file="${ROYALE_HOME}/js/libs/js.swc" > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> tofile="${ROYALE_HOME}/frameworks/themes/Halo/Halo.swc" > >>> >> > >> > > > /> > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > It looks like just providing some random SWC file in a > >>> >> > >> > > > location the FlashBuilder might be looking for. > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > Perhaps it would make sense to refactor my descriptors > >>> >> > >> > > > to have a "flashbuilder-support-assembly.xml" which we > >>> >> > >> > > > could one day simply > >>> >> > >> > remove. > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:47 > >>> >> > >> > > > An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant and > >>> >> > >> > > > Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, > >>> >> > >> > > > > macfonts.ser and winfonts.ser > >>> >> > >> > > > files are needed for? > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > It's something related to SWF font embedding. I would > >>> >> > >> > > > assume that Flash Builder expects those files to > >>> >> > >> > > > exist, but if the Flash Builder integration document > >>> >> > >> > > > doesn't mention them, then I don't > >>> >> > >> know. > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:42 PM Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Hi Josh, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Ok ... so that's done and looks a lot nicer now :-) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > I also finished the config-sanitazion and the config > >>> >> > >> > > > > files used in the Maven distribution should now > >>> >> > >> > > > > match the file names in the > >>> >> > >> > > distribution. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Can anyone tell me what the localfonts.ser, > >>> >> > >> > > > > macfonts.ser and winfonts.ser files are needed for? > >>> >> > >> > > > > They are simply completely empty filed the Ant build > >>> >> > >> > > > > createates via > >>> "touch" > >>> >> > >> > > > > commant. I could add them to the Maven distribution, > >>> >> > >> > > > > but only want to add stuff > >>> >> > >> > that's needed. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > But in it's current state I'm quite happy with the > >>> >> > >> > > > > new > >>> >> > >> distribution. > >>> >> > >> > > > > It looks pretty clean, everything needed is in there > >>> >> > >> > > > > and in the same location as with the Ant build, but > >>> >> > >> > > > > I left away things I tought are probably not > >>> >> > >> > > > > required in the distribution and are results of > >>> >> > >> > > > > simply packing the entire > >>> >> project up. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > I tested it with a number of example projects ant it > >>> >> > >> > > > > worked with all of them (Haven't tried all of them > >>> >> > >> > > > > though) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Would be cool if you could try it out and give me > >>> >> > >> > > > > some feedback on > >>> >> > >> > it. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2021 22:35 > >>> >> > >> > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >>> >> > >> > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > The src directory is probably enough for a good IDE > >>> >> > >> > > > > experience while developing a Royale app. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 1:27 PM Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Hi all, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > one question: Is it enough to package up the src > >>> >> > >> > > > > > directories of all modules in the "projects" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > directory to allow the > >>> >> > >> code-insights? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > I'm asking, cause I'm only packing up the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > essential parts of the > >>> >> > >> > > "asjs" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > project and don't want to have a half build system > >>> >> included. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:18 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > > and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Aaaaah ... ok ... thanks for the explanation. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > That does make sense ... guess I just never > >>> >> > >> > > > > > completely understood the typedef stuff ;) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > ... so I'll have to find a way to streamline the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > names of the typedef libraries in all of these 2 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > (Well actually probably just > >>> >> > >> > > > > > 2) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - js-external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > But that will be a thing for tomorrow ... calling > >>> >> > >> > > > > > it a day and signing off for today. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > I just pushed my changes from today ... so if you > >>> >> > >> > > > > > folks want to check what I'm doing ... now you > >>> >> > >> > > > > > have something to look at > >>> >> > >> > > > > > :.) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 23:13 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >>> >> > >> > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > > and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > As you've seen, there are three different > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > options: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path, js-external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > and swf-external-library-path. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > By default, external-library-path is used by both > >>> >> > >> > > > > > JS and SWF targets, but you can use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path to override the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path for a > >>> >> > >> > > > specific target. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > In other words, if js-external-library-path is > defined: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will still use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Similarly, if swf-external-library-path is defined: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and it will ignore > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will still use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > If both js-external-library-path and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path are > >>> >> > >> > > > > > defined: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the JS target will use js-external-library-path, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > and it will ignore external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > - the SWF target will use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and it will ignore > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > The air-config.xml, flex-config.xml, and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > royale-config.xml configs are all expected to be > >>> >> > >> > > > > > used for both JS and SWF > >>> >> > targets. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Different libraries are needed for each target, so > >>> >> > >> > > > > > we're using js-external-library-path to override > >>> >> > >> > > > > > which libraries are used for the JS target. The > >>> >> > >> > > > > > SWF target will use > >>> >> > >> external-library-path. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > The other -config.xml files are configs that are > >>> >> > >> > > > > > expected to be used with JS only. Basically, these > >>> >> > >> > > > > > ones can use external-library-path directly > >>> >> > >> > > > > > because they don't need to target SWF. If we > >>> >> > >> > > > > > wanted, we could change them to use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path instead, and they should > >>> >> > >> > > > > still work. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > In theory, we could always use > >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path, and never use > >>> >> > external-library-path. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > However, I do not recall if there was some legacy > >>> >> > >> > > > > > reason (like Flash Builder support) for why we > >>> >> > >> > > > > > defaulted to playerglobal.swc on the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > external-library-path for the SWF target instead > >>> >> > >> > > > > > of using swf-external-library-path. I think that > >>> >> > >> > > > > > js-external-library-path or > >>> >> > >> > > > > > swf-external-library-path were introduced before I > >>> >> > >> > > > > > started working on > >>> >> > >> > > > > the compiler, so I can only guess. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 1:45 PM Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Josh, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > While comparing the results I noticed there are > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > some inconsistencies in the config files and I'm > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > currently not quite sure to which is the correct > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > version: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > In: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - ace-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - create-js-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - jquery-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - js-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - node-config.xml The typedefs are defined in an > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > element called: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > In: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - air-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - flex-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - royale-config.xml The typedefs are defined in > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > an element called: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > js-external-library-path > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Which is the correct version? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Also are the target-player and swf-version > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > defined as properties in all configs except: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > - asdoc-config.xml (player 11.1 swf: 14) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Probably it would make sense to process the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > asdoc-config.xml the same way as all the others. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Right now I'd just keep it the way it is. Just > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > thought I'd point it > >>> >> > >> > > > > out. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 19:29 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Yes, that looks to me to be what the Ant build > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > is doing too, so I think you are correct. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Hi Josh > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Yeah .. I saw in the commit history, that they > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > sort of were creatd shortly after the big-bang > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > ;-) > >>> ... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > That's why I decided to take these as basis. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > What I'm now doing is generate a config from > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > each > >>> by: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > 1. Replacing the playerversion 2. Replacing > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > the swfversion > >>> >> > >> 3. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Replacing the locale 4. In case of a no-swf > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > distribution filtering out the references to > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > playerglobal > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > I hope I got things right ... but I'm only > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > including the output in the distribution and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > not the templates, as I assume they are not > >>> >> > >> > > > > > needed. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Is that corect? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Gesendet: Montag, 1. März 2021 18:46 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > I can tell you that the template config files > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > have existed since the Flex days. The > "create-config" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > task in frameworks/build.xml replaces certain > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > tokens in the template based on the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > build's current > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > configuration. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Traditionally, a distribution would include > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > all of the Ant build.xml files to allow users > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > to manually rebuild the framework with local > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > changes. If this still holds true, then the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > config templates are > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > probably required. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Josh Tynjala > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 1:07 PM Christofer > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > wrote: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Carlos, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > no ... the templates weren't created by me ... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > they always were in the frameworks dir ... I > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > think the ANT build takes the templates and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > inserts variables to generate the real > >>> >> > >> > > versions. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I think I'll try to use these to do the same > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with maven > >>> >> > >> ... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > unfortunately the files have gotten pretty > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > out of > >>> >> sync. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > But can anyone here tell me if the "template" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > files need to be in the distribution? Are > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > they needed for > >>> >> > anything? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Cause I would just add the generated versions. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 16:53 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > An: Apache Royale Development > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > <dev@royale.apache.org> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Betreff: Re: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > the Ant and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I do have some questions: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - the "framework" directory contains a log > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > of > >>> >> tupples: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > xyz-config-template.xml and xyz-config.xml: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Where does the xyz-config.xml get > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > generated from the template in the ANT > >>> >> > >> > > > build? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > (I assume it generates them from the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > templates as part of the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > build)... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > could we possibly omit the "templates"? It > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > seems as if they are only needed to > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > generate the configs for a given set of > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > configured > >>> properties. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > If that's the case, we don't need them in > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > distribution. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I always though the template was created by > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > you when you created the maven build for > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Royale. So if you think you can remove > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > templates, I think it would be good to > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > reduce files if they are not > >>> >> > >> > > > > > used at all. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > - The root element of the flex-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > was named > >>> >> > >> > > > > > "roayale-config" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > in the Maven distribution and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > "flex-config" in the Ant distribution and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > it contained a reference to the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > mxml-2009-manifest.xml. Also did the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > version contain a lot more implicit > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > imports as well as a fxg-base-class > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > element > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > maybe this could be the problem we're facing > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > with fx:Array > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So far the changes I found ... I updated > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the distribution in the > >>> >> "features/distribution-allignment" > >>> >> > >> > branch. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Great! > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > But I guess I'll keep working on this and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > try to get the maven distribution to have > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the same directory structure as the Ant > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > one (but excluding all the > >>> >> > >> unnecessary stuff). > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Chris, let us know when is safe to test, and > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > I'll do a > >>> >> > >> try. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks for working on this! > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:28 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: AW: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the Ant and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ok ... regarding the Array problem ... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I have found the "Array.as" file in > >>> >> "compiler-externc" > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > and "royale-typedefs/js" ... both are > >>> identical ... > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure which one is used (I'm > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > a bit rusty regarding how all of these > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > externs and stuff work > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > together) > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > I did check and the royale-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > lists the mxml-2009-manifest.xml (in both > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > the non-swf as well as the with-swf > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > version) so not quite sure why adding that > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > to the configuration > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > changes anything. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Von: Christofer Dutz > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 12:08 > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > An: dev@royale.apache.org > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Betreff: [MAVEN DISTRIBUTION] getting the > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Ant and Maven aligned > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > so thankfully Carlos re-sent me this link: > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > flex-sdk/README_integration_with_Adobe_Fla > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > shBu > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ild > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > er > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > .tx > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > t > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > at master > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > * apache/flex-sdk (github.com)< > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/blob/ma > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ster > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > /id > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > e/ > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > fla > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > sh > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bu il de r/ RE AD ME > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > _integration_with_Adobe_FlashBuilder.txt > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > So it seems as if we don't have a > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ide/flashbuilder/flashbuilder-config.xml > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > with a "express-install-swf" element in it > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > (we don't have the entire > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > file) ... do we need this? > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Besides that, it seems all is setup as > >>> expected. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Will continue looking into other things > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > that could be > >>> >> > >> > wrong. > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Chris > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Carlos Rovira Apache Member & Apache Royale > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > PMC *Apache Software > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > Foundation* http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > -- > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > >> > > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> -- > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > -- > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> > >>> >> Piotr Zarzycki > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > -- > >>> > > >>> > Piotr Zarzycki > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Piotr Zarzycki > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
