Nice. Did you consider separating the display from the bead? For example,
<js:Group id=”ctxm1”> <html:Div text="Check All“ click="checkAll(true)"/> <html:Div text=“Unchek All” visible="{this.isEditable()}" click="checkAll(false)"/> </js:Group> Could go under <fx:Declarations> and then <js:ContextMenu menuObject=”{ctxm1}”/> Could go under various elements. From: Hugo Ferreira<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2023 1:00 AM To: dev@royale.apache.org<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org> Subject: Re: Right click bead for context menu Hi, I have committed today the ContextMenu component (no Jewel dependency). Example of usage: <j:beads> <js:ContextMenu> <html:Div text="Check All“ click="checkAll(true)"/> <html:Div text=“Unchek All” visible="{this.isEditable()}" click="checkAll(false)"/> </js:ContextMenu> </j:beads> The context menu can be added to any component area (inclusive and tested in itemrender DataGrid). Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia sábado, 7/01/2023 à(s) 01:51: > Hi, > > Yes, it seems that this component does not exist at the moment in the > framework. > Meanwhile, I started to develop this component and it's now partial > finished and I am trying my best to make enough generic to add it to the > framework. > > Thanks. > > Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia sexta, 6/01/2023 > à(s) 12:10: > >> I couldn't find it but I have seen them do work in mx. >> I have a custom implementation that needs some work but it works for me, >> if you need it, let me know and I'll share it (Jewel) >> >> Hiedra >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> >> Enviado el: miércoles, 4 de enero de 2023 14:54 >> Para: dev@royale.apache.org >> Asunto: Right click bead for context menu >> >> Hi, >> >> There is already any bead to rigth click and context menu ? >> Like this: >> >> https://itnext.io/how-to-create-a-custom-right-click-menu-with-javascript-9c368bb58724 >> I didn't find and probably I will have to create it but before I start I >> would like to be sure that there isn't already something similar. >> >> Thank you. >> >