I see now in the console it downloads js-swf version of binaries: download:
Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.sha512 To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.sha512 Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.sha512 To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.sha512 get_asc: Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.asc To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.asc Getting: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.asc To: /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.asc I have tried that instead the one which was build which will be probably under "apache-royale-0.9.12-src". However I feel like script should not only build swf/non swf version of Royale based on that: -Duse-flash=false - but as well download it. I will go trough the process farther to see if I get js-only version of Royale build inside: "apache-royale-0.9.12-src" pt., 22 lis 2024 o 10:32 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > Hi Yishay, > > It looks like js-swf version of binaries do not work in Moonshine at all. > While I'm ok with that because we are using js-only with our project, that > I have to check why following command on ApprovalScript.xml do not produce > js-only version of binaries: ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml > -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2 > > I will run process again to make sure that is the case, later I will run > process with ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2 > -Duse-flash=false > - explicitly set. > > I would like to produce js-only binaries to check if they are working with > Moonshine. > > czw., 21 lis 2024 o 19:26 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > napisał(a): > >> Piotr, >> >> When you compare with 0.9.10 is there a difference? >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 1:26 PM >> To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2 >> >> Hi Yishay, >> >> I have gone through tests using ApprovalScript.xml while - building from >> source and everything else went fine, produced binaries doesn't work in >> Moonshine. Build trough approval produced folder >> "apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf" - Inside there are three folders as >> usual >> - I tried "royale-asjs" - Moonshine recognize this correctly, language >> server is working fine, but when I tried build my project using it - >> Console was basically empty - no sign of building. - Is this the right >> folder which can be used in IDE ? >> >> With my projects I'm usually using binaries JS-only, not js-swf. >> >> Using Maven artifacts my projects are building correctly. >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> >> >> śr., 20 lis 2024 o 09:30 Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> >> napisał(a): >> >> > Thanks Yishay, I've never checked this before but I will over the >> weekend. >> > Thx >> > >> > -----Mensaje original----- >> > De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> >> > Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 7:29 >> > Para: dev@royale.apache.org >> > Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2 >> > >> > Yes, thanks for making this happen, Yishay :) I will try to find time in >> > the next two days, otherwise it will be Saturday at the latest. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM Piotr Zarzycki < >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks Yishay! Good work! I will try to look into that tomorrow. >> > > >> > > Piotr Zarzycki >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 18:15, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Great work! Thanks! >> > > > >> > > > FYI, I’m traveling for a few days. I’m not sure when I’ll have time >> > > > to test. It might not be until next week. >> > > > >> > > > Harbs >> > > > >> > > > > On Nov 18, 2024, at 11:04 PM, Yishay Weiss >> > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > This is the discussion thread. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Yishay Weiss >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Piotr Zarzycki
