Hi Piotr, The file name of the binary distribution to download is on line 146 of ApproveRoyale.xml. You can modify this file locally to remove the "-swf" at the end to download the JS-only binary distribution instead.
-- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:38 AM Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see now in the console it downloads js-swf version of binaries: > > download: > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.sha512 > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.sha512 > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.sha512 > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.sha512 > > > get_asc: > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.asc > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-src.tar.gz.asc > > Getting: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/royale/0.9.12/rc2/binaries/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.asc > > To: > > /Users/piotrzarzycki/Dev/apache/royale-sources/release_test/apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf.tar.gz.asc > > I have tried that instead the one which was build which will be probably > under "apache-royale-0.9.12-src". > > > However I feel like script should not only build swf/non swf version of > Royale based on that: -Duse-flash=false - but as well download it. > > > I will go trough the process farther to see if I get js-only version of > Royale build inside: "apache-royale-0.9.12-src" > > pt., 22 lis 2024 o 10:32 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > Hi Yishay, > > > > It looks like js-swf version of binaries do not work in Moonshine at all. > > While I'm ok with that because we are using js-only with our project, > that > > I have to check why following command on ApprovalScript.xml do not > produce > > js-only version of binaries: ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml > > -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2 > > > > I will run process again to make sure that is the case, later I will run > > process with ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml -Drelease.version=0.9.12 -Drc=2 > -Duse-flash=false > > - explicitly set. > > > > I would like to produce js-only binaries to check if they are working > with > > Moonshine. > > > > czw., 21 lis 2024 o 19:26 Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > > napisał(a): > > > >> Piotr, > >> > >> When you compare with 0.9.10 is there a difference? > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2024 1:26 PM > >> To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org> > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2 > >> > >> Hi Yishay, > >> > >> I have gone through tests using ApprovalScript.xml while - building from > >> source and everything else went fine, produced binaries doesn't work in > >> Moonshine. Build trough approval produced folder > >> "apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf" - Inside there are three folders as > >> usual > >> - I tried "royale-asjs" - Moonshine recognize this correctly, language > >> server is working fine, but when I tried build my project using it - > >> Console was basically empty - no sign of building. - Is this the right > >> folder which can be used in IDE ? > >> > >> With my projects I'm usually using binaries JS-only, not js-swf. > >> > >> Using Maven artifacts my projects are building correctly. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Piotr > >> > >> > >> > >> śr., 20 lis 2024 o 09:30 Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> > >> napisał(a): > >> > >> > Thanks Yishay, I've never checked this before but I will over the > >> weekend. > >> > Thx > >> > > >> > -----Mensaje original----- > >> > De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> > >> > Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de noviembre de 2024 7:29 > >> > Para: dev@royale.apache.org > >> > Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2 > >> > > >> > Yes, thanks for making this happen, Yishay :) I will try to find time > in > >> > the next two days, otherwise it will be Saturday at the latest. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM Piotr Zarzycki < > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Thanks Yishay! Good work! I will try to look into that tomorrow. > >> > > > >> > > Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 18:15, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Great work! Thanks! > >> > > > > >> > > > FYI, I’m traveling for a few days. I’m not sure when I’ll have > time > >> > > > to test. It might not be until next week. > >> > > > > >> > > > Harbs > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Nov 18, 2024, at 11:04 PM, Yishay Weiss > >> > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > This is the discussion thread. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > Yishay Weiss > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Piotr Zarzycki > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki >
