Yishay, I have compiled the SDK several times without problems and all my
projects have worked fine (big and small. OnlyJS)
I have not answered because I have not followed the steps of the protocol.
Sorry, next time I will try to have more time.
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 4 de diciembre de 2024 10:46
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2
Josh, I noticed you manually bumped some config files to version 0.9.13. There
is a script we run after release which is supposed to take care of that, so I
think it's unnecessary.
Is anybody else planning to review the release candidate?
________________________________
From: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 3:47 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2
Just two things I'd like to note (neither affected my vote):
1. (Apologies if this may have been already discussed somewhere and I missed
it). For the release notes, maybe it would be good to have a "0.9.11 Omitted"
(or skipped or something else) to signify that this version was explicitly
skipped. I am not sure if it is necessary or not, and I expect it can simply be
done in the future. It just seems odd (to me) to have a version sequence with
no mention of that.
2. The ApproveRoyale.xml script reported version 1.9 for my Java version, which
is java 9. But my actual java executable in the path and JAVA_HOME is java 17,
and i don't believe I have java 9 anywhere anymore.
So maybe the ApproveRoyale script should have this:
Java ${java.version}
instead of:
Java ${ant.java.version}
but I don't know.... if anyone has suggestions, please share :)
On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 9:28 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> It is also worth mentioning that when the approval script finishes
> successfully, the apache-royale-x.y.z-src directory will actually
> contain a binary distribution that the approval script built from
> source. This may be JS-only or JS-SWF depending on which environment
> variables that you have set.
>
> Certain environment variables being non-empty trigger the build of a
> JS-SWF SDK. So, to build a JS-only SDK, you should make sure that
> those environment variables are NOT set.
>
> If I remember correctly, the main one that should not be set when you
> want to build a JS-only SDK is AIR_HOME.
>
> However, here are several SWF environment variables that are not
> needed when building the JS-only SDK with the approval script, and
> it's probably safest to clear them all before running the approval
> script if you want a JS-only SDK:
>
> AIR_HOME
> PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME
> PLAYERGLOBAL_VERSION
> FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
>
> I cleared all of these environment variables on my machine, and I got
> a JS-only SDK in the apache-royale-0.9.12-src directory that worked in
> vscode-as3mxml.
>
> One final note, after a JS-SWF SDK is built, it will not include
> Adobe's playerglobal.swc or the AIR SDK. The JS-SWF SDK won't work in
> IDEs like Moonshine or VSCode until these are added manually.
>
> Hopefully, this helps folks with testing!
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:27 AM Piotr Zarzycki
> <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Yishay,
> >
> > I have gone through tests using ApprovalScript.xml while - building
> > from source and everything else went fine, produced binaries doesn't
> > work in Moonshine. Build trough approval produced folder
> > "apache-royale-0.9.12-bin-js-swf" - Inside there are three folders
> > as
> usual
> > - I tried "royale-asjs" - Moonshine recognize this correctly,
> > language server is working fine, but when I tried build my project
> > using it - Console was basically empty - no sign of building. - Is
> > this the right folder which can be used in IDE ?
> >
> > With my projects I'm usually using binaries JS-only, not js-swf.
> >
> > Using Maven artifacts my projects are building correctly.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> >
> >
> > śr., 20 lis 2024 o 09:30 Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Thanks Yishay, I've never checked this before but I will over the
> > weekend.
> > > Thx
> > >
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> Enviado el: miércoles, 20 de
> > > noviembre de 2024 7:29
> > > Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS} Release Apache Royale 0.9.12 RC2
> > >
> > > Yes, thanks for making this happen, Yishay :) I will try to find
> > > time
> in
> > > the next two days, otherwise it will be Saturday at the latest.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Yishay! Good work! I will try to look into that tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 18:15, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great work! Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > FYI, I’m traveling for a few days. I’m not sure when I’ll have
> > > > > time to test. It might not be until next week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Harbs
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 18, 2024, at 11:04 PM, Yishay Weiss
> > > > > > <yishayj...@hotmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Yishay Weiss
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
>
