Last minute change of plans, I'll be giving the talk on SDAP tomorrow. Looking forward to meeting you all.
- Frank On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > tg > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors and > > help for the initial release. > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat there! > > > > Julian > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>: > > > > Cool. > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > the IoT > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch up > > with > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > projects > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > sometimes be different. > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > channel, but > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > tg > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska <fg...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission is > > today, I > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > the wiki > > > directly? > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > talking about > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > code > > is > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > release > > at > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > requirements > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > releasing all > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > challenging. > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > were > > told > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > still > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > not JAR > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > issue: > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now it > > seems > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > actually > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable to > > find > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights (I'm > > seeing > > > one > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > growing > > > the > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, which > > will > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > from. Sort > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there any > > talks > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe a > > > lightning > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > mentioned > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that is > > the > > > thing > > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > > release > > > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should have a > > 0.x > > > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two > > cents). > > > > > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska <fg...@apache.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP > > > > > > > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards > > graduation: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > > > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > > > > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need > > to be > > > > > aware of? > > > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > > > > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work towards a > > > > repeatable > > > > > build pipeline has been started. > > > > > > > > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed > Oceanographic > > > Matchup > > > > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE) > > > components > > > > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a standardized > > quality > > > > > flag. > > > > > > > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > > > > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and > > interest > > > is > > > > > high. However, active participation from project members is > low. > > A push > > > > is > > > > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting > the > > > > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can > > claim a > > > 1.0 > > > > > version of SDAP. > > > > > > > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > > > > > > > [X] Initial setup > > > > > [X] Working towards first release > > > > > [X] Community building > > > > > [ ] Nearing graduation > > > > > > > > > > Date of last release: > > > > > > > > > > XXXX-XX-XX > > > > > > > > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > > > > > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > > > > > > > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things > > falling > > > > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open > > issues > > > > > that need to be addressed. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > > > > > > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > > > > > Comments: > > > > > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > > > > > Comments: > > > > > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
