Sorry- Justin got back to me last night, I saw this morning- he said yes that's the right thing to do and that he saw the entry.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:48 AM Frank Greguska <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI - I've edited the Wiki directly to add our report to it. > > - Frank > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:25 AM Trevor Grant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Great- I think its lunch after Brian's talk- let's all plan on meeting > > there then we can go somewhere and grab a bite. > > > > tg > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:20 AM Julian Feinauer < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I joined the sdap list a while back when you were looking for Mentors > and > > > help for the initial release. > > > Since then I became IPMC member so I could also offer you to support in > > > the release (and, if still needed) as mentor as well. > > > > > > I will also be at ACNA so would be nice to get in contact and chat > there! > > > > > > Julian > > > > > > Am 04.09.19, 22:49 schrieb "Trevor Grant" <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Cool. > > > > > > Brian's talk is at the same time I'm supposed to be in / moderating > > > the IoT > > > room, but I'm going to try to sneak away for an hour to see that. > > > > > > Justin will be speaking first up in the IoT track so we can catch > up > > > with > > > him down and chat there about release requirements. There are other > > > non-Java Apache projects but I also I've heard what non-incubator > > > projects > > > are allow to grandfather in vs what incubator projects must do can > > > sometimes be different. > > > > > > Re: wiki- I don't know- I've just asked on the incubator slack > > > channel, but > > > haven't had a response yet. Do what you think is best(?) if I hear > > > something on there I'll respond. > > > > > > tg > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:18 PM Frank Greguska <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Trevor. > > > > > > > > Since there are no further comments and deadline for submission > is > > > today, I > > > > am comfortable with submitting this report. Am I supposed to edit > > > the wiki > > > > directly? > > > > > > > > wrt your questions: > > > > I believe Brian Wilson is planning on attending ApacheCon and > > > talking about > > > > SDAP and is currently working on putting together materials. > > > > I think we're ok with a 1.0 release because this version of the > > code > > > is > > > > running in a few different places. The main problem with the > > release > > > at > > > > this point is understanding and complying with all the legal > > > requirements > > > > Apache has to call it a release. Also the fact that we're not > > > releasing all > > > > components to Maven (because they aren't Java components) makes > > > > understanding the Apache release requirements documentation > > > challenging. > > > > Most of our release artifacts are actually docker images but we > > were > > > told > > > > we cannot push unreleased docker images to dockerhub, and it's > > still > > > > unclear what the process is then for releasing artifacts that are > > > not JAR > > > > files. This is the discussion that was kicked off due to that > > issue: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cdc55e46a6fe23e1c0fcbdee6032f4949572311b0ded10cf6353be0@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > but I did not have time to follow it entirely. Re-reading it now > it > > > seems > > > > that there is still a bit of an open question as to what we're > > > actually > > > > supposed to do. > > > > > > > > - Frank > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:47 AM Trevor Grant < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This looks good- thanks Frank. > > > > > > > > > > Improving/creating docs is always hard. It might be advisable > to > > > find > > > > > someone who can work on this and give them committer rights > (I'm > > > seeing > > > > one > > > > > hasn't been added since Feb, not horrible, but we want to keep > > > growing > > > > the > > > > > community). Improved docs will lead to more user adoption, > which > > > will > > > > > create more committer incentives and a pool of people to draw > > > from. Sort > > > > > of a chicken and egg problem. > > > > > > > > > > Has there been any advocacy for the project? (e.g. are there > any > > > talks > > > > > coming up at Apache Con to get people interested? If not maybe > a > > > > lightning > > > > > talk? Also blog posts). Advocacy can kick start the previously > > > mentioned > > > > > feedback loop. > > > > > > > > > > I'm seeing that we're pushing for v1.0 - i know ASF wide that > is > > > the > > > > thing > > > > > everyone is pushing for, however it's probably OK to do a v0.x > > > release > > > > > first just to get the ball moving (in fact probably should > have a > > > 0.x > > > > > release first to check for bugs before pushing 1.0, just my two > > > cents). > > > > > > > > > > This is looking good and I'm signing off, those are my > comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:07 AM Frank Greguska < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review the Podling report for SDAP below: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP is an integrated data analytic framework for Big Science > > > problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22. > > > > > > > > > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards > > > graduation: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release > > > > > > 2. Improve/create user guide documentation > > > > > > 3. Improve committer participation > > > > > > > > > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board > wish/need > > > to be > > > > > > aware of? > > > > > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > > > > > We are continuing to attract new committers. > > > > > > > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > > > > > SDAP is still working towards its first release. Work > towards a > > > > > repeatable > > > > > > build pipeline has been started. > > > > > > > > > > > > New functionality has been added to the Distributed > > Oceanographic > > > > Matchup > > > > > > Service (DOMS) and Extensible Data Gateway Environment (EDGE) > > > > components > > > > > > that allow for filtering in situ measurements by a > standardized > > > quality > > > > > > flag. > > > > > > > > > > > > How would you assess the podling's maturity? > > > > > > > > > > > > There are several deployments of SDAP actively being used and > > > interest > > > > is > > > > > > high. However, active participation from project members is > > low. > > > A push > > > > > is > > > > > > needed to cross the t's and dot the i's in regards to meeting > > the > > > > > > requirements Apache has for releasing software so that we can > > > claim a > > > > 1.0 > > > > > > version of SDAP. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > > > > > > > > > > > [X] Initial setup > > > > > > [X] Working towards first release > > > > > > [X] Community building > > > > > > [ ] Nearing graduation > > > > > > > > > > > > Date of last release: > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXX-XX-XX > > > > > > > > > > > > When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? > > > > > > > > > > > > Maya Debellis was elected as a committer on 2019-02-08 > > > > > > > > > > > > Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things > > > falling > > > > > > through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open > > > issues > > > > > > that need to be addressed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, mentors have been helpful and responsive. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ](sdap) Jörn Kottmann > > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > [ ](sdap) Trevor Grant > > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > [ ](sdap) Lewis John McGibbney > > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
