Yes. I didn’t want to use the word “issue” twice in one sentence.

Julian

> On Dec 22, 2022, at 15:51, Riley Kuttruff <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Julian, I'll try to get the thread started by EOD.
> 
> Can I ask what you mean by logging cases? Is that like creating issues on 
> Jira?
> 
> Thanks,
> Riley
> 
>> On 2022/12/22 23:37:44 Julian Hyde wrote:
>> PS Don’t make a new RC. The IPMC will vote on the exact same artifacts. 
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>>>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 15:20, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Next step is to carry out a vote on the gene...@incubator.apache.org list. 
>>> 
>>> This may seem like unnecessary bureaucracy; for which I apologize. The 
>>> reason is that only a PMC (in this case the Incubator PMC, IPMC) may 
>>> release code on behalf of the ASF. 
>>> 
>>> Practically speaking, the release will receive due diligence by experts in 
>>> the IPMC. It’s likely that they will find problems, and if so, we may need 
>>> another RC, and two votes, to resolve them. Please be patient, because this 
>>> is the learning process. 
>>> 
>>> Riley, Glad to see that you have sent a RESULT email already. Please start 
>>> a vote thread on general@, referencing the thread on dev@. Good luck!
>>> 
>>> Can you also log cases for the issues I noted during the vote. The IPMC 
>>> tends to be lenient for the first release, especially if the podling is 
>>> learning and improving. 
>>> 
>>> Julian
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 22, 2022, at 11:44, Riley Kuttruff <r...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> So the vote for rc2 passed. What are our next steps? Do I push the 
>>>> .tar.gz and .asc files to 
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/incubator/sdap ?
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2022/12/14 20:04:29 Riley Kuttruff wrote:
>>>>> I verified, built and tested the release tarballs in the same manner I 
>>>>> did before and it passed just the same. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe it's compliant with ASF policy but I'm not 100% sure so I'm 
>>>>> holding off on the vote. 
>>>>> - We added DISCLAIMER & README files to all release tarballs
>>>>> - I went through and checked MOST of the files for the ASF license 
>>>>> headers and added them where needed though I may have missed something
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2022/12/13 19:36:26 Nga Chung wrote:
>>>>>> HI all,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I started a VOTE thread for 1.0.0rc2, but can someone else please 
>>>>>> volunteer
>>>>>> to take over as release manager because I will be away 12/16/22 - 
>>>>>> 1/16/23.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I captured initial release instructions here
>>>>>> https://github.com/ngachung/incubator-sdap-nexus/blob/SDAP-414/docs/release.rst
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Nga
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 1:07 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> By the way, I wouldn't create a new RC for the vote. Just vote on the
>>>>>>> RC1 you already have. We know we'll need to iterate through a few RCs
>>>>>>> before we get a good one.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 1:05 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hey, that looks pretty good! In fact it looks a lot like an Apache
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A few things:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 1. I saw you added dist/dev/incubator/sdap/KEYS; can you move that
>>>>>>>> file so that its path is dist/release/incubator/sdap/KEYS. Its main
>>>>>>>> purpose will be for people who download the release after it has been
>>>>>>>> released and want to verify the signatures. Putting it in 'release'
>>>>>>>> will ensure that it is automatically mirrored to
>>>>>>>> https://downloads.apache.org
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2. I got the following output from gpg:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> gpg: Signature made Mon 05 Dec 2022 10:52:22 PM PST
>>>>>>>> gpg:                using RSA key
>>>>>>> 1392A8A11801359247A803D8D2449E0EB5EF1E73
>>>>>>>> gpg: Good signature from "Nga Chung (CODE SIGNING KEY)
>>>>>>>> <nch...@apache.org>" [unknown]
>>>>>>>> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>>>>>>> gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>>>>>>> owner.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This means that the artifacts are signed correctly, but you are not in
>>>>>>>> my web of trust. Soon after the release, we should have a key-signing
>>>>>>>> party (or you should get your key signed by a colleague who has a
>>>>>>>> well-connected key).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 3. At first glance, the contents of the .tar.gz files look pretty
>>>>>>>> good. I haven't checked the headers etc. yet. There seems to be a
>>>>>>>> LICENSE.txt and NOTICE in each, which is good. You should also add a
>>>>>>>> DISCLAIMER and/or DISCLAIMER-WIP file (required by the incubation
>>>>>>>> process [1]). I also recommend adding a top-level README in each
>>>>>>>> .tar.gz that describes the purpose of the file, and how to build it
>>>>>>>> (for example see Calcite's README [2])
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> A good next step would be to start a vote. Craft an email with the
>>>>>>>> same general structure as Apache Hop (incubating) 0.99-rc2 [3] and
>>>>>>>> send it to dev@. Then PPMC members should vote on the release, each
>>>>>>>> describing the checks that they made. Then finish the vote with an
>>>>>>>> email with a [RESULT][VOTE] or [CANCEL][VOTE] subject line. (We know
>>>>>>>> the vote will fail, due to the missing DISCLAIMER file, but it's good
>>>>>>>> to practice the process, and with many people scrutinizing the release
>>>>>>>> we will find issues faster.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You'll also want to craft release notes (they don't have to be in the
>>>>>>>> release, but they should be somewhere accessible for people to read).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> And you should be writing that "how to" guide as you go along, if
>>>>>>>> you're not already.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers
>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/main/README
>>>>>>>> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ncnok4clt6k491zv6c3v4kk2fc41qsz2
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:06 PM Nga Chung <ngatch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Riley, thank you for adding all the missing ASF header and the NOTICE.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Riley's changes have been merged and rc1 artifacts have been uploaded
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc1/
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Has anyone had any success testing rc0?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Julian, any suggestions on next steps?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Nga
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:03 PM Kuttruff, Riley K (US 398F-Affiliate)
>>>>>>>>> <riley.k.kuttr...@jpl.nasa.gov.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It appears some of the source files are missing the ASF header. I
>>>>>>> did a
>>>>>>>>>> check for all the Python files across the repositories and added
>>>>>>> them where
>>>>>>>>>> needed in a pair of PRs (nexus & ingester; nexusproto had no .py
>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>> missing the header).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I still have yet to check for any non-python source files.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Riley
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/22, 4:29 PM, "Nga Chung" <nch...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  So this email thread probably needs renaming or we can start a
>>>>>>> new one
>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>  we're proceeding with a Version 1.0.0 release instead of
>>>>>>> 0.4.5a56.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  Anyways, with help from many folks we now have a release
>>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>>>>>> that can
>>>>>>>>>>  be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0/__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGjkf-Wmw$
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  Instructions for building docker images from source can be found
>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGMdzQUnc$
>>>>>>>>>>  Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtG-tQ0nvg$
>>>>>>>>>>  Associated docker images can be found here:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache*2Fsdap__;JQ!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtG5KMpZEg$
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  Here's how I created rc0. I will get these instructions into
>>>>>>> github but
>>>>>>>>>>  wanted to get all this out first for your review.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git clone --branch release/1.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto.git__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGbmDU9OM$
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  cd incubator-sdap-nexusproto*/*
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git ls-files > /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  tar cvfz apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz -T
>>>>>>> /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  gpg --armor --output apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>>>>>>  --detach-sig apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  shasum -a 512 apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz >
>>>>>>>>>>  apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git clone --branch release/1.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester.git__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGgkAuYFg$
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  cd incubator-sdap-ingester/
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git ls-files > /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  tar cvfz apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz -T
>>>>>>> /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  gpg --armor --output apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>>>>>> --detach-sig
>>>>>>>>>>  apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  shasum -a 512 apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz >
>>>>>>>>>>  apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git clone --branch release/1.0.0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus.git__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtG19U3rPQ$
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  cd incubator-sdap-nexus/
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  git ls-files > /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  tar cvfz apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz -T /tmp/manifest.txt
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  gpg --armor --output apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>>>>>>>>>> --detach-sig
>>>>>>>>>>  apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  shasum -a 512 apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz >
>>>>>>>>>>  apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  svn co
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtG8upBcY0$
>>>>>>>>>> sdap
>>>>>>>>>>  mkdir sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>  cp
>>>>>>> incubator-sdap-nexusproto/apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz*
>>>>>>>>>>  sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0/.
>>>>>>>>>>  cp incubator-sdap-ingester/apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz*
>>>>>>>>>>  sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0/.
>>>>>>>>>>  cp incubator-sdap-nexus/apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz*
>>>>>>>>>>  sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0/.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  svn add apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  svn ci -m "Uploading release candidate Apache SDAP
>>>>>>>>>> apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0 to
>>>>>>>>>>  dev area" apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc0
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>  Nga
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>  On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:26 PM Julian Hyde <
>>>>>>> jhyde.apa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> hanks for volunteering to be release manager!
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on will be in the following
>>>>>>> directory (or
>>>>>>>>>>> something very much like it):
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-0.4.5a56-rc0/__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGsl1T6OQ$
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>> * “dev” being the place for candidate releases (to be replaced
>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> “release”
>>>>>>>>>>> when the release is final)
>>>>>>>>>>> * “sdap” being the project name (prefixed with “incubator/“
>>>>>>> while
>>>>>>>>>> sdap is
>>>>>>>>>>> incubating)
>>>>>>>>>>> * “apache-sdap” being the component
>>>>>>>>>>> * “0.4.5a56” being the version
>>>>>>>>>>> * “rc0” being the release candidate label
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On release, you will copy the artifacts to
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-0.4.5a56/__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGQnZZiUU$
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Note that ‘dev’ became ‘release’ and the ‘rc0’ label was
>>>>>>> removed.
>>>>>>>>>> And by
>>>>>>>>>>> the time you release, you'll also need a KEYS file similar to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> one in
>>>>>>>>>>> the bRPC project:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/brpc/KEYS__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtG858uAsg$
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Browse
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGJkaorxg$
>>>>>>>>>> and you’ll see that all
>>>>>>>>>>> projects use this directory structure.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Let’s look at the artifacts that were in Calcite’s last
>>>>>>> release. In
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> directory
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.31.0-rc2/__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGkK8Q9VQ$
>>>>>>>>>>> sh
>>>>>>>>>>> you’ll see the following files:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> * apache-calcite-1.31.0-src.tar.gz # source tar ball
>>>>>>>>>>> * apache-calcite-1.31.0-src.tar.gz.asc # armored signature
>>>>>>>>>> generated by
>>>>>>>>>>> PGP
>>>>>>>>>>> * apache-calcite-1.31.0-src.tar.gz.sha512 # SHA512 checksum
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>> src.tar.gz file
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> SDAP will need equivalent files.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Now, how to write to dist.apache.org? That web server is a
>>>>>>> view
>>>>>>>>>> onto an
>>>>>>>>>>> ASF
>>>>>>>>>>> source code repository managed by the Subversion source control
>>>>>>>>>> system. ASF
>>>>>>>>>>> uses it for content management of releases.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> First, install subversion. "sudo apt-get install subversion” or
>>>>>>>>>> similar.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Then checkout the tree:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> svn co
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/trunk__;!!PvBDto6Hs4WbVuu7!aY2tIy4CD6wRO7JlwQ9_XSOpDkqvhu8QMq2ROLe907bKV-UqYPygNoR8NjtGTWMmcJY$
>>>>>>>>>> sdap
>>>>>>>>>>> cd sdap
>>>>>>>>>>> mkdir apache-sdap-0.4.5a56-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Create some files, then check them in:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> svn add apache-sdap-0.4.5a56-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>> svn ci -m’Uploading release candidate Apache SDAP
>>>>>>>>>> sdap-0.4.5a56-rc0 to
>>>>>>>>>>> dev area’ apache-sdap-0.4.5a56-rc0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> These instructions are from memory, so there might be a few
>>>>>>> mistakes.
>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully you get the general idea. Do some Google searches and
>>>>>>>>>> you’ll
>>>>>>>>>>> probably find the release instructions used by other projects.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> You'll need to log into subversion using your ASF username and
>>>>>>>>>> password,
>>>>>>>>>>> but I don’t remember the details.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Be sure to write a ‘how to’ so that the next release manager
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>> follow
>>>>>>>>>>> your steps, and add it to the source code when you’re done. And
>>>>>>>>>> maybe one
>>>>>>>>>>> or two shell scripts.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I also recommend that you create a bug with the title ‘Release
>>>>>>> SDAP
>>>>>>>>>>> 0.4.5a56’. It will be a useful place to have discussions, link
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>> bugs, release notes, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2022, at 3:32 PM, Nga Chung <nch...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to be the release manager for this first release.
>>>>>>> Where
>>>>>>>>>> exactly
>>>>>>>>>>> do we upload the 3 .tar.gz (1 per repository) to?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Nga
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 5:12 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Regarding testing. I recommend that the release manager
>>>>>>> creates a
>>>>>>>>>>> recipe ("HOWTO") for the steps to create a release. One of
>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>> steps
>>>>>>>>>>> is a manual smoke test (e.g. am I able to start the server and
>>>>>>> do x,
>>>>>>>>>>> y, and z simple operations).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Other people voting on the release can do their own smoke
>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> But do bear in mind that if there are bugs, this does not
>>>>>>> prevent a
>>>>>>>>>>> release. Clearly you don't want show-stopper bugs like code
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't compile.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 3:47 PM Perez, Stepheny K (US 398F)
>>>>>>>>>>> <stepheny.k.pe...@jpl.nasa.gov.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I’d like to start the conversation regarding our first official
>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> release. From what I can tell, these are the major items that
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>>>>> completed before we can move forward:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.       Identify a release manager. Any volunteers?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 2.       Create release tarball
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 3.       Write release notes
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.       Write installation instructions from source (Riley
>>>>>>> Kuttruff
>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> started this work)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 5.       Push docker images to Dockerhub (and update
>>>>>>> quickstart with
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> these versions)
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Another important task before moving forward would be testing
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> latest
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> SDAP analysis image 0.4.5a56. I have personally used this
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>>>>> any issues. Has anyone else upgraded to this latest alpha
>>>>>>> version?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>>>>>>>>>>> Stepheny
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to