-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58267/#review171451
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.postgres.sql
Lines 15 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58267/#comment244393>

    If we want to store unique "PATH_Name" only once, we need to have three 
tables: one for "AUTHZ_OBJ_I to AUTHZ_OBJ_NAME", one for "PATH_ID to 
PATH_NAME", and the third table for relationship "AUTHZ_OBJ_I with PATH_ID"


- Na Li


On April 10, 2017, 12:44 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58267/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2017, 12:44 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry, Alexander Kolbasov, Hao Hao, Na Li, Sergio Pena, 
> Vamsee Yarlagadda, and Vadim Spector.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-1629
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1629
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Older JDO defination had issues handling multiple paths associtaed with one 
> Authorizable object.
> 
> Submitted code changes address this issue. Here is the snapshot of the changes
> 
> 1. Change the JDO definition to have Path as separate entity. 
> 2. SQL changes needed for the handle the new JDO definition.
> 3. Application changes to use new JDO definition.
> 4. Updated unit test cases to test the case where an authz object is 
> associated with more than one path.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/MAuthzPathsMapping.java
>  56e456eb37dfbbbb6d0a14402f57dbc400be9b72 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/MPath.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/model/package.jdo
>  e981bcf0f327346c09cdbe5785fb8824fc62e704 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/SentryStore.java
>  802b9c6cbf8e9ad015e37037b809b58c956de746 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.derby.sql
>  1883626262bf4f4936f156a7ac74365b9b5873df 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.mysql.sql
>  1829e2fa1f02a4339e7af4bf45a169013e9ec65f 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.oracle.sql
>  7de9751892a8ff84067f67d542ac58d33e9148d8 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/007-SENTRY-1365.postgres.sql
>  adf5f1f39596309183f8c80d2c8ad1f1a7730236 
>   sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-db2-1.8.0.sql 
> 547bbe8136186658e7fe76ab24934157ea5300ff 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-derby-1.8.0.sql 
> 6474389a18ea59da28d3d7125cf227c7aaa7f7aa 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-mysql-1.8.0.sql 
> 1ab83432db233ee4e7aa054adc1b82c26248a099 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-oracle-1.8.0.sql 
> 0418b298f7cbd8f430733cb329e9fca263bda0f7 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-postgres-1.8.0.sql
>  68d2c8d53d7c468269ca2c41986ef8651b94f5c7 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/resources/sentry-upgrade-db2-1.7.0-to-1.8.0.sql
>  5376c166659b3e8e373c8c20818f5b1290af90c9 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/test/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/TestSentryStore.java
>  aaa0b9fd30bb68fded67f885af4f77bc71398e77 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58267/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Testing done:
> 1. Tested the sql changes with derby, mysql, oracle, postgres and db2.
> 2. Added unit tests to be sure that the actual issues is addressed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to