-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/#review200218
-----------------------------------------------------------




sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/CounterWait.java
Lines 191 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/#comment280876>

    This will print as:
    
    "not blocked, returning from wait 125"
    
    This is somewhat confusing.
    
    The important thing there is that the request for 125 is can proceed 
immediately.



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/CounterWait.java
Lines 203 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/#comment280877>

    See comment above.



sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/CounterWait.java
Line 213 (original), 216 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/#comment280878>

    Again, "returning from wait 125" is confusing message.


- Alexander Kolbasov


On March 29, 2018, 5:25 p.m., kalyan kumar kalvagadda wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2018, 5:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for sentry and Na Li.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SENTRY-2190
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-2190
> 
> 
> Repository: sentry
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Debug logging in CounterWait is not good enough to actually an issue around 
> this area. It's a good idea to extend the current logging.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> sentry-provider/sentry-provider-db/src/main/java/org/apache/sentry/provider/db/service/persistent/CounterWait.java
>  d8c82970b56b1599a07f0e26edab8ed3d59b9948 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/66336/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> kalyan kumar kalvagadda
> 
>

Reply via email to