Possibly...
shale/framework/trunk/
shale/maven/trunk/
shale/sandbox/
The 'framework' directory could be called something else... I'd just
as soon have shale/shale/trunk, but Ted says it will confuse viewvc.
+1 for these three separate projects. We defnitely could use a
sandbox for our works in progress.
What about shale/core/trunk instead of framework?
Sandbox doesn't need trunk/branches/tags, you can just copy
sandbox/projectA to sandbox/projectB if you want to try something
else.
Good point. Sandbox is never released so it doesn't need to be
tagged. I'm thinking we would want nightly builds of the sandbox but
the version would always be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.
Sandbox stuff would go in the Shale JIRA instance I assume? I don't
think we want its own instance.
Wendy
Sean
