+1. I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source
stuff was about anyway. But I'm cool with either google or java.net.
Greg
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this
to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for
the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a
fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute
binaries wither hibernate, etc. That will allow more people to use
the app. No matter how easy you make it, some people are just putoff
by compiling their own source. I admit, sometimes I fall into this
category (if my interest is only casual.)
If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration between shale
and this project. This would include links to the shale-petstore from
the shale site and referring people on the user list to the
shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example.
Thoughts?
Sean
On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License,
Version
> > 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that?
>
> Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a notice at
the
> bottom of every page: "All text is available under the terms of the
> GNU Free Documentation License."
>
> As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not
listed on
> Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so asking on
legal-discuss would be a good idea.
In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore
application
(including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use
stuff from
there. <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>)
Craig
[1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
>
> --
> Wendy
>