Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was --> Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

[Greg Reddin]

What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies?  Was  
that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it  
to be a separate project?

Greg
On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:

And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-)

Do you envision this being more then the petstore app?  Also, are we
sure we want google as opposed to dev.java.net?  I don't know much
about the google option.

It seems like we can have discussion via a google group.  What about
distribution of jar files?

Sean

On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1.  I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source
> stuff was about anyway.  But I'm cool with either google or  
java.net.


I just set up "shale-goodies" for us at Google[1].  Note that you  
must have
a GMail account to log in with for SVN access, but that's already  
true for a
bunch of us.  Send me your GMail username and I'll add you in as a  
project
owner.

Greg


Craig

[1] http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies/


On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier -  
moving this
> > to google's new open source area.  While I understand the  
reasons for
> > the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to  
host a
> > fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
> >
> > On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute
> > binaries wither hibernate, etc.  That will allow more people  
to use
> > the app.  No matter how easy you make it, some people are just  
putoff
> > by compiling their own source.  I admit, sometimes I fall into  
this
> > category (if my interest is only casual.)
> >
> > If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration  
between shale
> > and this project.  This would include links to the shale- 
petstore from
> > the shale site and referring people on the user list to the
> > shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation  
License,
> >> Version
> >> > > 1.2.  What about the text?  Any ideas on that?
> >> >
> >> > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia?  There's a  
notice at
> >> the
> >> > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the  
terms of the
> >> > GNU Free Documentation License."
> >> >
> >> > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not
> >> listed on
> >> > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >> I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so  
asking on
> >> legal-discuss would be a good idea.
> >>
> >> In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore
> >> application
> >> (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use
> >> stuff from
> >> there.  <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>)
> >>
> >> Craig
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Wendy
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>