On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What about just adding shale-petstore as part of shale-goodies? Was that just a thing of getting wires crossed or did you intend for it to be a separate project?
It was definitely "great minds thinking alike at the same time" ... :-) I think we would want to set up a playground where multiple libraries or examples could be hosted, rather than a separate one for each, so we can use it for a little community building too. Re: Google vs java.net, I confess to the same curiousity Greg mentioned about the new features. Yes, you can use a Google Group for discussion. No, they don't have an answer for binary distros yet, but that's definitely something theiy are working on. Greg Craig On Aug 3, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> And I just set up a shale-petstore ;-) > > Do you envision this being more then the petstore app? Also, are we > sure we want google as opposed to dev.java.net? I don't know much > about the google option. > > It seems like we can have discussion via a google group. What about > distribution of jar files? > > Sean > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/3/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > +1. I was wanting to figure out what all that google open source >> > stuff was about anyway. But I'm cool with either google or >> java.net. >> >> >> I just set up "shale-goodies" for us at Google[1]. Note that you >> must have >> a GMail account to log in with for SVN access, but that's already >> true for a >> bunch of us. Send me your GMail username and I'll add you in as a >> project >> owner. >> >> Greg >> >> >> Craig >> >> [1] http://code.google.com/p/shale-goodies/ >> >> >> On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Sean Schofield wrote: >> > >> > > I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - >> moving this >> > > to google's new open source area. While I understand the >> reasons for >> > > the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to >> host a >> > > fully functional sample app using several different technologies. >> > > >> > > On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute >> > > binaries wither hibernate, etc. That will allow more people >> to use >> > > the app. No matter how easy you make it, some people are just >> putoff >> > > by compiling their own source. I admit, sometimes I fall into >> this >> > > category (if my interest is only casual.) >> > > >> > > If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration >> between shale >> > > and this project. This would include links to the shale- >> petstore from >> > > the shale site and referring people on the user list to the >> > > shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > >> > > Sean >> > > >> > > On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation >> License, >> > >> Version >> > >> > > 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that? >> > >> > >> > >> > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a >> notice at >> > >> the >> > >> > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the >> terms of the >> > >> > GNU Free Documentation License." >> > >> > >> > >> > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not >> > >> listed on >> > >> > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so >> asking on >> > >> legal-discuss would be a good idea. >> > >> >> > >> In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore >> > >> application >> > >> (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use >> > >> stuff from >> > >> there. <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>) >> > >> >> > >> Craig >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Wendy >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > >> >> >
