So the contributions someone makes is ambiguous.I just mention that thing.
But whatever,the community will know who makes contributions. In conclusion,I approve the rules. ---Original--- From: "[email protected]"<[email protected]> Date: Fri, Sep 6, 2019 19:54 PM To: "dev"<[email protected]>; Subject: Re: Talk about how to set committer bar Because way of contributions are diversity, so do we really need a clear rule for voting, or just start to vote if some PPMCs think a contributor could be prompt as a committer? ------------------ Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo ?????? <[email protected]> ??2019??9??6?????? ????4:40?????? > I agree with the rules. > > > But the question is ,such as rule 3, we may not have effect method to > meature how much contributions someone makes. > > > lulu > > > ------------------ ??????件 ------------------ > ??件??: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>; > ????????: 2019??9??6??(??????) ????10:49 > ??件??: "dev"<[email protected]>; > > ????: Re: Talk about how to set committer bar > > > > Ok, we can set the committer bar more dynamic for different stage. > > Right now, the rules may include: > > 1. Contribute codes, contributor may contribute several pull requests. > 2. Answer questions and participant discussion on Github and mailing list > actively. > 3. Other things for participant and contribute for community, such as talk > about the project in public conf/event, publish articles and so on. > > Any thing else? > ------------------ > > Liang Zhang (John) > Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo > > > Justin Mclean <[email protected]> ??2019??9??6?????? ????10:20?????? > > > Hi, > > > > Again each project is different and sets their own committer bar, but I > > wouldn't worry so much about the PR being perfect either, they can always > > be fixed and improved. By setting the quality bar too high people may not > > contribute because they don't think this code is good enough, even when > > it's a good idea that would improved the code base. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > >
