> I agree that the 6 month guideline is probably too strict. Maybe replace this with a general "Make several high-quality contributions to code, documentation, or mail lists".
Agree. Maybe we can separate committers and PPMCs, the original rules are suitable for PPMCs. For committers, better for using dynamic rules, and just let PPMCs to vote. ------------------ Liang Zhang (John) Apache ShardingSphere & Dubbo Craig Russell <[email protected]> 于2019年9月7日周六 上午3:24写道： > I agree that the 6 month guideline is probably too strict. Maybe replace > this with a general "Make several high-quality contributions to code, > documentation, or mail lists". > > The 6 month guideline might be more appropriate for PPMC members. > > And "understanding the core technology deeply" will disqualify most > contributors. I would remove this guideline. > > I appreciate that ShardingSphere project takes suggestions like Justin's > well. > > Regards, > Craig > > > On Sep 5, 2019, at 6:46 AM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> 1. Make contributions consistently during the past 6 months > >> 2. Understand the core technology of ShardingSphere deeply > >> 3. Obey the Code of Conduct > >> 4. Submit high-quality content > >> 5. Enable Google Two-factor authentication > > > > While each PPMC/PMC can set their own bar this is far too high IMO, in > particular expecting someone to continually contribute for 6 months. Some > project votes in committers after two or three contributions. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > Craig L Russell > [email protected] > >
