> On June 26, 2012, 4:57 p.m., Stanton Sievers wrote:
> > Do you know why the exception gets thrown when ActiveX is disabled?  
> > ActiveX is disabled yet ActiveXObject != 'undefined'?  I didn't see any 
> > mention of an exception on the msdn site: 
> > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2011/05/02/activex-filtering-for-developers.aspx

I did see that article and tried checking for ActiveX filtering, but it didn't 
seem to change anything. I think ActiveX filtering is different from what I was 
seeing, which was that due to security settings (I was unable to determine 
exactly which setting was responsible, but adding the website as a trusted site 
made the exception go away) ActiveX was completely disabled for the website. I 
do find it strange that the browser claims that ActiveX is supported but then 
throws an exception any time an ActiveX object is created, but it could just be 
a limitation of the way it was implemented.


- Matthew


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5589/#review8602
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 26, 2012, 5:43 p.m., Matthew Reiter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5589/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 26, 2012, 5:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for shindig.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Code review for my proposed solution to "makeRequest fails on IE when ActiveX 
> is disabled".
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SHINDIG-1808.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1808
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/features/src/main/javascript/features/core.io/io.js 1354070 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5589/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested makeRequest on Firefox 12, Chrome 20.0.1132.43 beta-m, IE 9 with 
> ActiveX disabled and IE 9 with ActiveX enabled.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matthew Reiter
> 
>

Reply via email to