To all This proposal doesn't have a conflict or plan to change the mechanism of being committer or PMC. They are different. Committer and PMC are considered by the contributions to the community in various ways. As reviewers, they are focusing on the main repo codes about core features, documentation and bug fix.
So, please don't consider this as a pressure, I just want to explore a new way to make the change more stable and have more eyes on the PRs officially. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Sheng Wu <wush...@apache.org> 于2020年2月16日周日 上午10:30写道： > Hi Dev and committer team > > Since today, we have 207 contributors in our main repo. And many PRs > landed every week, which have to be approved by one person. But with the > increasement of the committer and the community, I want to ask your opinion > about > > Do we need to set up the rule for the main repo,* requiring two approvers > for every PR?* > > I am not a preferred answer, and Jian Tan asked about this in a PR several > months ago. > Recently, I and Zhenxu Ke are the most active reviewers, if we could have > more committers are willing to sign up to do the routine review, please let > me know. Routine review means you could review the PR(most) in 24 hours and > give feedback. > > Please reply to this mail in this form. > > *Name, Review Field(agent, backend or both). * > > If this gets passed, and we have reviewers more than 6, I will consider > this as a YES. This list will be shown up on the contributor page[1] as the > reviewer list. > > > [1] > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/guides/README.md > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Apache SkyWalking > Apache Incubator > Apache ShardingSphere, ECharts, DolphinScheduler podlings > Zipkin > Twitter, wusheng1108 >
