On Sat, 2021-08-07 at 16:13 +0100, dav...@apache.org wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 12:16, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi David, > > > > On Fri, 2021-08-06 at 07:31 +0100, dav...@apache.org wrote: > > > To prepare this implementation so that it can be released and be a > > > proper > > > component, I would propose that it moves out of the Sling > > > Whiteboard > > > into > > > its own repository at Apache Sling. > > > > Sounds good to me. What is the proposed repository name? > > > > How about org.apache.sling.osgifeature > Or alternatively org.apache.sling.feature.osgi
I think we use the org.apache.sling.feature artifact id prefix for all feature model artifacts and that would get us more consistency, but I don't have a strong opinion, so any would be fine by me. We usually discuss this upfront because if someone points out a flaw in the naming that we have to ask infra to rename, and that is an "expensive" operation. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Using+Git+with+Sling Thanks, Robert > > ? > > Best regards, > > David
