Yes, sure - name and description are good Carsten
2013/12/31 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > Hi Carsten, > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> > wrote: > > ...I thought about making this more generic and have an > > adaptTo method on the Feature class instead and each functionality > > (resource type mapping, hiding resources) gets an own interface and > either > > the feature can be adapted to this or now. So calling adaptTo would be > the > > equivalent of hasXXX or canXXX... > > Works for me, good idea! > > I'd still keep the getDescription() method on the Feature, I think > this it's useful even if we don't use it internally. > > -Bertrand > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
