I've updated the implementation as discussed, however I'm not that happy with the new service interface names. I came up with ResourceHiding and ResourceTypeMapper...I hope someone can come up with better names :)
Carsten 2013/12/31 Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> > Yes, sure - name and description are good > > Carsten > > > 2013/12/31 Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > >> Hi Carsten, >> >> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > ...I thought about making this more generic and have an >> > adaptTo method on the Feature class instead and each functionality >> > (resource type mapping, hiding resources) gets an own interface and >> either >> > the feature can be adapted to this or now. So calling adaptTo would be >> the >> > equivalent of hasXXX or canXXX... >> >> Works for me, good idea! >> >> I'd still keep the getDescription() method on the Feature, I think >> this it's useful even if we don't use it internally. >> >> -Bertrand >> > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > cziege...@apache.org > -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
