+1 for cancelling and starting a new vote Regards Julian
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > It's unclear to me how to handle a release vote when the artifacts are > changed during the vote. E.g. > > - start release on 2015-04-01 > - a problem is discovered on 2015-04-02 > - the problem is fixed on 2015-04-03 > > Is it OK to continue with the vote or do we mandate that the vote is > cancelled? > > If we decide it's OK to continue with the vote we also need to decide > what to do with: > > - +1 votes on the previous artifacts ( probably ignore ) > - -1 votes on the previous artifacts ( probably keep as vetos unless > the voter withdraws/recasts the vote ) > - the duration of the vote ( probably restart the 72 hours count ) > > I don't have a very strong opinion about this, but I would be less > confused if releases were immutable :-) and any change of the artifacts > under vote would mean cancelling the vote and starting a new one. But > I'm happy to do what works for everyone, given what we have clear rules > for it. > > Cheers, > > Robert
