> One more point: versions - reuse or increase? > Although versions are cheap for us, it confuses our users when versions are > "missing". It's even more confusing that AEM 6.1 uses Sling i18n 2.4.0 which > was _not_ released. So I'm for reusing here.
IMHO this is actually a point against re-using version. If the version 2.4.0 had been re-used, you would not even know that there is a broken bundle in AEM 6.1. Regards Julian On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Oliver Lietz <apa...@oliverlietz.de> wrote: > On Monday 20 July 2015 15:45:14 Robert Munteanu wrote: >> Hi, > > hi Robert, > >> It's unclear to me how to handle a release vote when the artifacts are >> changed during the vote. E.g. >> >> - start release on 2015-04-01 >> - a problem is discovered on 2015-04-02 >> - the problem is fixed on 2015-04-03 >> >> Is it OK to continue with the vote or do we mandate that the vote is >> cancelled? > > we really should cancel and start over. > >> If we decide it's OK to continue with the vote we also need to decide >> what to do with: >> >> - +1 votes on the previous artifacts ( probably ignore ) >> - -1 votes on the previous artifacts ( probably keep as vetos unless >> the voter withdraws/recasts the vote ) >> - the duration of the vote ( probably restart the 72 hours count ) > > all your points +1, but I prefer to cancel (though I didn't asked for last > week). > >> I don't have a very strong opinion about this, but I would be less >> confused if releases were immutable :-) and any change of the artifacts >> under vote would mean cancelling the vote and starting a new one. But >> I'm happy to do what works for everyone, given what we have clear rules >> for it. > > +1 > > And using a dedicated repo per artifact means less work if only one of a bunch > fails. > > One more point: versions - reuse or increase? > Although versions are cheap for us, it confuses our users when versions are > "missing". It's even more confusing that AEM 6.1 uses Sling i18n 2.4.0 which > was _not_ released. So I'm for reusing here. > > Regards, > O. > >> Cheers, >> >> Robert >
