Thanks Carsten for your input! Should I count it as a +1 (so far there has been 2 x +1) ?
Regards, Timothee 2017-01-30 9:47 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > while I agree that it feels a little bit strange release without any > functional changes, there is nothing wrong with doing this release. As > you say releasing is cheap. > > Carsten > > Timothee Maret wrote > > Hi, > > > > 2017-01-27 13:55 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: > > > >> On Thursday 26 January 2017 12:58:34 Stefan Seifert wrote: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> (although it looks strange that the list of changes contains no > >> functional > >>> change and only an improved unit test coverage) > >> > >> Does improved test coverage really justify a new release? > >> > > > > The motive is a technical one. Indeed, a release is needed for us @ Adobe > > as we run internal tests on released artefacts. > > > > Generally, I thought that releasing are cheap and thus we could go for > it. > > However, if it does not make sense from Sling POV, I would cancel the > > release process. > > Please let me know. > > > > Regards, > > > > Timothee > > > > > >> > >> O. > >> > >>> stefan > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > [email protected] >
