Thanks Carsten! I guess it does not hurt to be formal ;-) Tim
2017-01-30 13:59 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>: > Oh... > > +1 :) > > Carsten > > Timothee Maret wrote > > Thanks Carsten for your input! > > > > Should I count it as a +1 (so far there has been 2 x +1) ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Timothee > > > > 2017-01-30 9:47 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> while I agree that it feels a little bit strange release without any > >> functional changes, there is nothing wrong with doing this release. As > >> you say releasing is cheap. > >> > >> Carsten > >> > >> Timothee Maret wrote > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> 2017-01-27 13:55 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>>> On Thursday 26 January 2017 12:58:34 Stefan Seifert wrote: > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> (although it looks strange that the list of changes contains no > >>>> functional > >>>>> change and only an improved unit test coverage) > >>>> > >>>> Does improved test coverage really justify a new release? > >>>> > >>> > >>> The motive is a technical one. Indeed, a release is needed for us @ > Adobe > >>> as we run internal tests on released artefacts. > >>> > >>> Generally, I thought that releasing are cheap and thus we could go for > >> it. > >>> However, if it does not make sense from Sling POV, I would cancel the > >>> release process. > >>> Please let me know. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Timothee > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> O. > >>>> > >>>>> stefan > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Carsten Ziegeler > >> Adobe Research Switzerland > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > Adobe Research Switzerland > [email protected] >
