Oh... +1 :)
Carsten Timothee Maret wrote > Thanks Carsten for your input! > > Should I count it as a +1 (so far there has been 2 x +1) ? > > Regards, > > Timothee > > 2017-01-30 9:47 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>: > >> Hi, >> >> while I agree that it feels a little bit strange release without any >> functional changes, there is nothing wrong with doing this release. As >> you say releasing is cheap. >> >> Carsten >> >> Timothee Maret wrote >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2017-01-27 13:55 GMT+01:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> On Thursday 26 January 2017 12:58:34 Stefan Seifert wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> (although it looks strange that the list of changes contains no >>>> functional >>>>> change and only an improved unit test coverage) >>>> >>>> Does improved test coverage really justify a new release? >>>> >>> >>> The motive is a technical one. Indeed, a release is needed for us @ Adobe >>> as we run internal tests on released artefacts. >>> >>> Generally, I thought that releasing are cheap and thus we could go for >> it. >>> However, if it does not make sense from Sling POV, I would cancel the >>> release process. >>> Please let me know. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Timothee >>> >>> >>>> >>>> O. >>>> >>>>> stefan >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> Adobe Research Switzerland >> [email protected] >> > -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland [email protected]
