On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 12:09 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > ...I think as long as the ASF is fine with this I would also rather > > promote the usage of Github instead > > of gitbox (because of its richer feature set) and therefore I am > > finally convinced that entering the Github > > SCM URL is fine there.... > > I'm fine with that in general but cutting releases from ASF > repositories is a strong requirement. > > Worst case we could add instructions to our release process, using > git > diff to compare the ASF and GitHub repositories before cutting a > release.
Hm, you're right and we should cut releases from the gitbox urls. Together with Konrad's notes on the Maven release plugin this makes a pretty strong case for using gitbox as the canonical URL everywhere. Thanks, Robert
