Yes, in theory all commits to branch_8x are releasable at the time in the
minds of whoever is doing the commit/merge.  Nevertheless, we humans are
very fallible and a baking period of a few days allows fix-ups and such
that ultimately improve quality a little.  Of course this can delay
features a tiny bit and it's annoying to back-port to yet another branch
when there are last-minute fixes.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:53 AM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That's the process I've been following, so not sure what your point is
> David? The release branch didn't get cut last week because there were
> a number of JIRAs marked as blockers for 8.10 and we needed clarity
> about how to move forward from the committers involved with those
> tickets. Also, I don't see the point in requiring an extra backport
> even if trivial if we know some features are coming in soon. From
> where I sit, any code change that hits 8.x should be releasable
> immediately or it shouldn't be committed.
>
> Tim
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:31 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > The release branch separate from cutting the RC used to be quite normal;
> not exceptional.  We should continue the practice for release stability.
> It also gives clarity for those of us like me that have something ready-ish
> to merge on which 8x version it should go into.
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:26 AM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the heads up on LUCENE-10088 Mike. I'd still like to cut
> >> the release branch today, but won't start the RC until I get word back
> >> from you on that issue. I know this adds another backport for you but
> >> I can do that once it lands on 8x.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:18 AM Michael McCandless
> >> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Timothy,
> >> >
> >> > Heads up: I'm currently digging on this issue (LUCENE-10088: "too
> many open files" in two failed builds, one in main, one in 8.x), and I'm
> worried that maybe the root cause was backported to 8.x, i.e. maybe we have
> a new file handle leak.
> >> >
> >> > If so, this might be a blocker for 8.10.0 release.
> >> >
> >> > I'll try to make progress today on getting to the root cause.
> >> >
> >> > Mike McCandless
> >> >
> >> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 1:43 PM Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for the feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >> My plan right now is to cut the release branch for 8.10 on *Tuesday,
> >> >> Sept. 7* (Monday is a US holiday).  Hopefully this gives enough time
> >> >> to get the remaining issues addressed.
> >> >>
> >> >> After the release branch is cut, there should be some discussion on
> >> >> any new changes coming into that branch before RC1 comes out (I
> >> >> usually give a day or two after creating the release branch before
> >> >> creating RC1)
> >> >>
> >> >> May I please ask for some help with the Lucene 8.10 release notes?
> >> >> I'll do the notes for Solr. Please add the notes here:
> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote8_10
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Tim
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 11:15 AM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +1 to cutting the 8.10 branch and getting the release moving. Will
> be good to get the #9981 patch out there. Tests seem happy for a while.
> Thanks for chasing these blockers.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP
> >> >> > Principal Engineer - Search  |  Amazon
> >> >> > Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer
> >> >> > nkn...@apache.org
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 11:18 AM Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah +1!  Lucene's first "non floating point" compliant release
> in a long time?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Mike
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 4:09 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> +1 to a 8.10 release and cutting a branch next week
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:02 PM Timothy Potter <
> thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Hi folks,
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Looks like we have a number of nice enhancements and bug fixes
> in
> >> >> >>>> Lucene and Solr for 8.10.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_8x/lucene/CHANGES.txt
> >> >> >>>>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_8x/solr/CHANGES.txt
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> However, there are a few open blockers marked for Solr 8.10,
> see:
> >> >> >>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15596?filter=12350839
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> The blockers (SOLR-15596, SOLR-15412, SOLR-14593) are not
> assigned to
> >> >> >>>> anyone. Is anyone looking at these? If not, do they need to
> block the
> >> >> >>>> 8.10 release?
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> I propose we should cut the release branch next week but that
> >> >> >>>> obviously depends on our decision around these open blockers.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Cheers,
> >> >> >>>> Timothy Potter
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> PS ~ I volunteer to be the Release Manager ;-)
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >>> Adrien
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Mike McCandless
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to