Would you want to keep that in the tech products, and instead migrate the test 
to not use sample_techproducts_config?



> On Nov 9, 2021, at 10:58 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ah, that's on me. I committed a fix, see 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10529 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10529>
> 
> Jan
> 
>> 9. nov. 2021 kl. 14:54 skrev Eric Pugh <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>> 
>> I picked one of the hopefully simpler failures: 
>> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleXMLTest.testPingHandler
>> 
>> I then went back in time by git checkout <somecommit> and I believe it was 
>> introduced by df70f902fb9a1fd2d2069641611efcdf353dc7c4, which is SOLR-10529: 
>> Solr UI Health Check enable/disable ping Button doesn't work 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 9, 2021, at 8:34 AM, Eric Pugh <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all….   Last night I merged some code 
>>> (f589607e700a94544fc546f5d641b5bfd695f32b) , and then received a message 
>>> from Github that the SolrJ tests had failed: 
>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/1436978925 
>>> <https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/runs/1436978925>
>>> 
>>> This morning I went to the previous commit point from 
>>> f589607e700a94544fc546f5d641b5bfd695f32b and reran the tests locally:
>>> 
>>>   solr git:(a363acdac48) gw -p solr/solrj test
>>> 
>>> Which resulted in 
>>> :solr:solrj:test (FAILURE): 1705 test(s), 10 failure(s), 21 skipped
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So..   Do the solrj tests not run on GitHub for branches normally?   Going 
>>> back to my branch, that appears to be the case.   Tips on what a better 
>>> workflow should be for these?   
>>> 
>>> Secondly, are these failures typical and a known issue, or is this 
>>> something where I need to revert f589607e700a94544fc546f5d641b5bfd695f32b?  
>>>   I remember back in the day the effort that Erick made to get all tests to 
>>> pass, but I don’t remember the details as I wasn’t a committer ;-).
>>> 
>>> An answer like “We know some tests fail and don’t worry about reverting 
>>> your code, it’s a problem, but a long term problem” is a okay answer!
>>> 
>>> Eric
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________
>>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
>>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com 
>>> <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy 
>>> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>>>         
>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
>>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
>>> whether attachments are marked as such.
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________
>> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> 
>> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>>  
>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
>> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of 
>> whether attachments are marked as such.
>> 
> 

_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | 
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | 
My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>  
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed 
<https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
    
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be 
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether 
attachments are marked as such.

Reply via email to