> I think it likely means that the intended benefit of filterCache, which is > the caching of fqs, is not happening because those cache entries will be > evicted almost as soon as they are created.
Yes, that's what I suspect is happening. Another problem with having q in the filterCache is that if your newSearcher is doing autowarming on some number of filterCache entries, it will be doing warming on q entries. This could be quite a bit of unnecessary work. > I wonder if maybe it would be a good idea to have a facetCache in addition to > filterCache. Same K,V as filterCache in the code, but entirely separate so > it does not interfere with caching of filters and can have a different > definition. That would make a lot of sense to me. Short of that, wouldn't it make sense for facets to put the q in the queryResultsCache, not the filterCache? Whatever comes of this, the docs could use some updates and clarifications, and especially discussion of tuning filterCache. I've started a ticket for that task, both as placeholder for the work, and as a place to aggregate notes and thoughts for when it gets done. Andy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
