Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and
marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4
I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it
up first.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16985

best
alex


On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:42 AM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote:

> It looks like the next Lucene version might be released soon, so we may
> want to wait for that. It will come with Java 21 support for the
> vector/memory map stuff.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:53 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex and Jan!
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Sept, 2023, 2:10 am Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Sure, it's all yours..
> > > You'll find what you need in the Release Wizard. Just run this script
> to
> > > get going.
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu <stilla...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > best,
> > > > alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2
> > optimizations,
> > > 21
> > > >> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been
> > > almost 2
> > > >> months since 9.3.
> > > >>
> > > >> I propose cutting the branch and preparing first RC on Tuesday Sept
> > > 26th,
> > > >> twelve days from today.
> > > >>
> > > >> I volunteer as RM, but will yield if one of our new committers wants
> > to
> > > >> try the Release Manager role!
> > > >>
> > > >> Jan
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to