Good question - I guess this is now "unblocked" now that 9.4.1 is out the door (thanks David!).
I guess, pending any objections, that my revised timing would be to begin "feature freeze" and create branch_9_5 Monday or Tuesday of next week. With the hope that I can get the first RC out by the end of the week? Best, Jason On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:40 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > When is the feature freeze? Please create the branch_9_5 at the time of > that. > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:45 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Is there an urgent need for this release? > > > > Have I seemed "urgent"? I suggested a mid-January 9.5 back on 12/6 (see > > the "9.4.1 release" thread). If anything I've been slow :-p > > > > Like I said in my initial message here - my motivation around 9.5 is just > > that I think there's some cool stuff lined up and I'd love to get that > out > > to folks. Getting features out is a "Good Thing", so why wait on 9.5 if > > there's not a particular reason to? If there is a concrete reason to > wait, > > that's fine too; I'm just curious to learn more about it. > > > > Best, > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:50 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Apple isn't urging anything, and you really can assume that's true > across > > > the board for our decisions. > > > > > > There are other concerns that are urging quick releases (See other > > mailing > > > lists for more information). > > > > > > I'm happy to let you continue the 8.11.3 release, and if you want to > wait > > > for 9.4.1 that is fine with me. But we do need to get it out quickly. > > > > > > - Houston > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:45 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > > > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Is there an urgent need for this release? > > > > I saw that Houston took over the 8.11.3 release process from me > without > > > any > > > > prior intimation. Is Apple asking both of you to hurry up? > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 20:35, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > but let 9.4.1 get out the door first.. > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to wait if that's the consensus, but is there a reason > one > > > > > release needs to block another? > > > > > > > > > > I could be blanking, but I don't think there's any technical > conflict > > > in > > > > > terms of where artifacts are staged, etc. is there? > > > > > > > > > > > getting through some one-time pains of key/GPG matters > > > > > > > > > > Definitely the worst bit in my recent experience; good luck! > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:08 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah I'm doing the 9.4.1 for real now... getting through some > > > one-time > > > > > > pains of key/GPG matters. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17096 solr.xml > support > > > for > > > > > > <clusterSingleton> plugins is pretty close! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:56 PM Jason Gerlowski < > > > gerlowsk...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > branch_9x has accumulated 3 new features, 19 improvements, 2 > > > > > > optimizations, > > > > > > > 11 bug fixes, and 7 "other changes" - I'd love to get these in > > > front > > > > of > > > > > > > users with a Solr 9.5.0 release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to volunteer as RM, and propose that we target next > > > > Thursday > > > > > > > January 18th to cut the branch and prepare the first RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
