+1 Fully agree, repeating a few subjective "major new" features there won't buy 
us anything really.

Jan

> 18. okt. 2026 kl. 19:01 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>:
> 
> Our "major-changes-in-solr-10.adoc" (and similar) are under the "upgrade
> notes" directory of the Solr ref guide. They each have the following
> heading preface:
> 
>> This page highlights the most important changes including new features
> and changes in default behavior as well as previously deprecated features
> that have now been removed.
> 
> I think the most important information on these pages are the upgrade
> aspect -- what should a user know about when upgrading to a particular Solr
> version.
> 
> But including "new features" is debatable. It's extra work to include this,
> takes a subjective decision, and can be forgotten. The distinction between
> forgotten and deciding not worthiness is indiscernible. I suspect I
> advocated for this scope years ago. It's certainly good to be aware of new
> things with each release but we already have the "release highlights" for
> each release, which does this. That is published with each release.
> 
> Proposal: The major changes pages should only have information related to
> upgrading. Upon every release, we can add a *link* to the release
> highlights.
> 
> Challenge/issues: The nice HTML form of the release highlights is one news
> entry with an anchor tag on an ever-growing/expanding list of whatever we
> categorize as "news" (mostly new releases + CVE it seems). The URL -- ex:
> https://solr.apache.org/news.html#apache-solrtm-9110-available doesn't seem
> particularly "durable". Meanwhile, our HTML Changelog is quite durable:
> https://solr.apache.org/docs/10_0_0/changes/Changes.html I could imagine a
> standalone HTML release highlights page... but wouldn't it be a nicer user
> experience to integrate that into the HTML changelog at the top? One
> integrated page for "highlights" + the actual changelog details.
> 
> Heck, perhaps even release-specific upgrade notes are best placed on this
> page somehow (vs the ref guide).


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to