But that's exactly what we have, isn't it? https://solr.apache.org/posts.html

And those release highlight news is for people to learn about features in a new 
release. It links to major-changes ref-guide, which we now propose to be a pure 
upgrade note, not changes as in new features; they can instead link to the 
detailed Changes.html page for the full list of changes.

Jan

> 20. okt. 2026 kl. 15:35 skrev Eric Pugh via dev <[email protected]>:
> 
> Maybe we just have a single news page that points to detailed pages?  
> https://rubyonrails.org/category/news
> 
> Then each news item could go as deep as we want?
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 18, 2026, at 5:52 PM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 Fully agree, repeating a few subjective "major new" features there won't 
>> buy us anything really.
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>>> 18. okt. 2026 kl. 19:01 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> Our "major-changes-in-solr-10.adoc" (and similar) are under the "upgrade
>>> notes" directory of the Solr ref guide. They each have the following
>>> heading preface:
>>> 
>>>> This page highlights the most important changes including new features
>>> and changes in default behavior as well as previously deprecated features
>>> that have now been removed.
>>> 
>>> I think the most important information on these pages are the upgrade
>>> aspect -- what should a user know about when upgrading to a particular Solr
>>> version.
>>> 
>>> But including "new features" is debatable. It's extra work to include this,
>>> takes a subjective decision, and can be forgotten. The distinction between
>>> forgotten and deciding not worthiness is indiscernible. I suspect I
>>> advocated for this scope years ago. It's certainly good to be aware of new
>>> things with each release but we already have the "release highlights" for
>>> each release, which does this. That is published with each release.
>>> 
>>> Proposal: The major changes pages should only have information related to
>>> upgrading. Upon every release, we can add a *link* to the release
>>> highlights.
>>> 
>>> Challenge/issues: The nice HTML form of the release highlights is one news
>>> entry with an anchor tag on an ever-growing/expanding list of whatever we
>>> categorize as "news" (mostly new releases + CVE it seems). The URL -- ex:
>>> https://solr.apache.org/news.html#apache-solrtm-9110-available 
>>> <https://solr.apache.org/news.html#apache-solrtm-9110-available> doesn't 
>>> seem
>>> particularly "durable". Meanwhile, our HTML Changelog is quite durable:
>>> https://solr.apache.org/docs/10_0_0/changes/Changes.html 
>>> <https://solr.apache.org/docs/10_0_0/changes/Changes.html> I could imagine a
>>> standalone HTML release highlights page... but wouldn't it be a nicer user
>>> experience to integrate that into the HTML changelog at the top? One
>>> integrated page for "highlights" + the actual changelog details.
>>> 
>>> Heck, perhaps even release-specific upgrade notes are best placed on this
>>> page somehow (vs the ref guide).
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> Disclaimer
> 
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others 
> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby 
> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in 
> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may 
> be unlawful.
> 
> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been 
> automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber 
> resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, 
> security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential 
> capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from 
> malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the 
> movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our 
> website.

Reply via email to