http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-31 14:57 ------- Subject: Re: ArchiveIterator uses opt_j for two different things On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 02:27:17PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd strongly prefer (I'm probably -1 on creatingh two new options for > this one) to keep opt_j as the number of processes (it parallels "make > -j") and add a new option for the temporary file vs. in-memory option. > The temporary file thing postdates -j by a long period and can just move > to a new option. I think just adding a new option for storage is doable, but FWIW I don't really care about "parallels ... -j" since this is all internal API names. The commandline can stay the same, but unless you're used to the module, "opt_j" isn't very descriptive of what the value means. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
