http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-31 16:25 ------- Subject: Re: ArchiveIterator uses opt_j for two different things -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > I'd strongly prefer (I'm probably -1 on creatingh two new options for > > this one) to keep opt_j as the number of processes (it parallels "make > > -j") and add a new option for the temporary file vs. in-memory option. > > The temporary file thing postdates -j by a long period and can just move > > to a new option. > > I think just adding a new option for storage is doable, but FWIW I don't > really care about "parallels ... -j" since this is all internal API names. > The commandline can stay the same, but unless you're used to the module, > "opt_j" isn't very descriptive of what the value means. oh btw, on that point, I'd be very pro adding *new*, meaningful names for opt_j, opt_n et al as they are used in the M:SpamAssassin:ArchiveIterator class, and leaving opt_j, opt_n et al as backwards-compat aliases. I agree, they don't make much sense for users of that module apart from mass-check. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBhYJGMJF5cimLx9ARAnZWAKCFHqthUt9p7kCQJTqkLsAjBqXWTACZAcd+ lReIi6mhyf165yWgmgAmtJI= =BMAd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
