http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4163





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-05-05 08:52 -------
Subject: Re:  RFE: add reporting support to spamd/spamc

> 
> I would like to start the spamc-part. But before I want to discuss the usage.
> I think it would make sense to make reporting and learning combineable, so 
> only 
> one time the message has to be transfered to spamd. But too I want to make it 
> an 
> single useable feature.
> Or should it be only configureable at the spamd site. So spamd would decide 
> to 
> report the message to razor...? So it could be user-dependet (sql database). 

Please feel free to get going on the spamc part, please note that I
had to backtrack on some of the spamc portions for learning to keep it
binary compatible, so please keep that that in mind.

You'll want to support reporting and revoking, unfortunately -r is
already taken as an option (it is time to move to long options for
spamc?), so do your best to come up with something sane.

No need to somehow combine the efforts, since reporting automatically
triggers a learn as spam and revoking automatically triggers a learn
as ham.

Lets not overthink the user dependent stuff, and just implement the
same way as we did with learn, if someone wants to add the ability to
turn things off later then we'll add it then.

I don't think the spamd portion will be too hard, but it might be a
bit too ambitious for 3.1, but we'll see.

Michael




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to