Michael Parker wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Are the hit-rates of the lists high enough that the results that aren't cached by the use of --reuse low enough to fall under the block triggering level? Either way, I guess we should get around to figuring out a way of caching the non-hits. I'm thinking of a method that assumes you ran the rules (based on the SA version in the message header) unless you've specifically told it you don't run a particular rule.
--reuse should take care of this. Everyone should save their X-Spam-* headers in their corpus msgs. Reuse sets the rule score to zero so for msgs that it didn't hit, and still have their X-Spam-Status header present we shouldn't be doing any sort of lookup.
Ah, that's right, thanks. For some reason I was thinking that any message that didn't previously have a hit recorded would have the tests run.
Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that can't be reused.
I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse. Daryl
