https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
--- Comment #30 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-12-07 22:48:38 UTC --- > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED/detail > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/detail > I also think we should reduce the DNSWL scores. It seems that policing at > DNSWL might be lax as they don't offer any easy and obvious way to report > violations. (No, I will not report violations of whitelists, or blacklist > FP's, because doing so would artificially effect the measurements that we do.) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.5 Based upon current performance I believe these scores would be appropriate. I think we should adjust these and returnpath's scores on-the-fly with sa-update as we have more carefully examined their performance over time. Any objections? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
