https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
--- Comment #31 from AXB <[email protected]> 2009-12-07 23:04:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED/detail > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091205-r887515-n/RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW/detail > > I also think we should reduce the DNSWL scores. It seems that policing at > > DNSWL might be lax as they don't offer any easy and obvious way to report > > violations. (No, I will not report violations of whitelists, or blacklist > > FP's, because doing so would artificially effect the measurements that we > > do.) > > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5 > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2 > RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -0.5 > > Based upon current performance I believe these scores would be appropriate. I > think we should adjust these and returnpath's scores on-the-fly with sa-update > as we have more carefully examined their performance over time. > > Any objections? objection to hijacking a bug for something else? yes pls open a separate bug for DNSWL adjustments/issues. this is about HABEAS and BSP -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
