https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
--- Comment #51 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-12-16 13:32:17 UTC --- rescore masscheck logs with mcsnapshot + today's trunk Scores ======================================================= # SUMMARY for threshold 5.0: # Correctly non-spam: 703979 99.95% # Correctly spam: 2562432 98.39% # False positives: 387 0.05% # False negatives: 41888 1.61% # TCR(l=50): 42.527842 SpamRecall: 98.392% SpamPrec: 99.985% score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI 0 -8.0 0 -8.0 score HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI 0 -4.3 0 -4.3 score RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0 -4.3 0 -4.3 score RCVD_IN_SSC_TRUSTED_COI 0 -3.7 0 -3.7 rescore masscheck logs with mcsnapshot + today's trunk Scores HABEAS, BSP and SSC Disabled ========================= # SUMMARY for threshold 5.0: # Correctly non-spam: 703971 99.94% # Correctly spam: 2562681 98.40% # False positives: 395 0.06% # False negatives: 41639 1.60% # TCR(l=50): 42.423235 SpamRecall: 98.401% SpamPrec: 99.985% rescore masscheck logs with mcsnapshot + today's trunk Scores HABEAS, BSP and SSC and DNSWL Disabled ========================== # SUMMARY for threshold 5.0: # Correctly non-spam: 703899 99.93% # Correctly spam: 2565063 98.49% # False positives: 467 0.07% # False negatives: 39257 1.51% # TCR(l=50): 41.597904 SpamRecall: 98.493% SpamPrec: 99.982% I did not test the new RP rules that replace the old rules, because it is not an apples to apples comparison. The comparison between these three scores however confirm the trend in Comment #49 from weekly results that the whitelists really don't make much of a difference. The old rules with doubled up scores were actually slightly harmful. For these reasons it seems correct to apply these new scores to the RP rules with these modest scores: score RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED 0.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0 score RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE 0.0 -3.0 0.0 -3.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
