https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
--- Comment #69 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2010-03-04 12:14:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #66) > Spamhaus would like DBL to be thought of as a new type of list, so perhaps a > new rule might be appropriate than trying to modify urirhssub. I considered adding a new rule keyword for this. My thoughts were that we already have a lot of different rule types, and in reality this is the same kind of RHSBL-lookup mechanism -- just with a different selection of what to query. Hence a tflag was more appropriate. Regarding the IP mask -- 0x7f000100 was chosen since initial plans were to return 127.0.0.2 for the "don't do that" listings for IP addresses. That would not match those, instead matching solely the 127.0.1.2 "real" listings. Since then, though, Spamhaus have instead gone with using 127.0.1.255, which is in the 127.0.1.x space, rendering that attempt futile. We could therefore now just use 2 as the mask for the URIBL_DBL rule, with the same effect and causing less confusion. devs, thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
