https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
--- Comment #70 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-03-04 13:36:19 UTC --- > Regarding the IP mask -- 0x7f000100 was chosen since initial plans were to > return 127.0.0.2 for the "don't do that" listings for IP addresses. That > would > not match those, instead matching solely the 127.0.1.2 "real" listings. Since > then, though, Spamhaus have instead gone with using 127.0.1.255, which is in > the 127.0.1.x space, rendering that attempt futile. > > We could therefore now just use 2 as the mask for the URIBL_DBL rule, with the > same effect and causing less confusion. devs, thoughts? Please followups on this masking topic to Bug 6362. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
