https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
--- Comment #71 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2010-03-04 14:40:11 UTC --- Spamhaus DBL return codes / sections are aligned on human comprehensible decimal boundaries. Thus a bitmask does not have any advantage here. http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=Spamhaus%20DBL#291 Instead of using a bitmask of 2, I'd rather use the expected 127.0.1.2 return code for the URIBL_DBL rule. This, unlike a bitmask, will also prevent the "IP queries prohibited!" .225 response from FP'ing. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
