https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6545
--- Comment #11 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2011-03-19 22:31:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > There were requests for ability to report abuse to DNSWL here: Thanks, Darxus. However... That was not a request for the ability to report. That was a complaint about DNSWL hits downscoring spam, "just below the threshold". Particularly noteworthy about this is, that the threshold the user was talking about is NOT the SA default threshold of 5.0, which is what's being used for score generation -- but a threshold of 6.31, which is I believe a higher Amavis default. None of his sample headers provided scored below 6.0, still classified spam by stock SA. He did not provide evidence (other than to you and Matthias privately), and even mentioned inappropriate trusted and internal settings for forwarders could have been causing this. There is no final conclusion on the list. [1] (And please ignore the sub-thread by Michelle, which, yet again, has been shown to be due to incorrect trusted networks settings.) So far, my assessment of Target Milestone 3.4 still stands. I have not seen sufficient demand or potential users, to raise this for inclusion in the current stable 3.3 branch -- which requires even more review and votes. [1] Care to share what these samples have shown? Feel free to send the data to me privately, or the private@ list. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
