https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6577
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from Greg Troxel <[email protected]> 2011-04-28 10:24:21 EDT --- >From the header, I don't think it's accurate to characterize the header as obfuscated. It appears to be the address as recorded by mail.xxxx.com, not something provided by the previous hop. The basic issue is that there are two ways to deal with IPv6. One is to have user programs open both v4 and v6 sockets, and the other is to use these mapped addresses so that a listening v6 socket will also get connections that come from v4. So SA should be treating this address exactly as if it were just the v4 address, and it seems that is indeed what is happening. So I concur with the resolution, but I don't think calling this "obfuscated" is accurate. It is odd that the octets in the encapsulated v4 address are in decimal. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
